Engineer A Third-Party Upstream Flood Risk Notification Twenty Homes
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Third-Party_Upstream_Flood_Risk_Notification_Twenty_Homes
Properties
Instance of
Third-PartyUpstreamFloodRiskCommunityNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Third-PartyUpstreamFloodRiskCommunityNotificationObligation
Case context
Engineer A has identified through professional judgment that the proposed tidal crossing upgrade will materially accelerate uninhabitability of twenty upstream homes, but Client B has directed Engineer A to forgo the specialized analysis that would quantify this risk.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A is obligated to notify the twenty upstream homeowners in writing of the identified risk that the tidal crossing upgrade may accelerate their homes' uninhabitability by a decade or more, based on Engineer A's preliminary professional judgment, so that they can take protective action and participate meaningfully in regulatory proceedings.
Temporal scope
Upon Engineer A's formation of the preliminary professional judgment regarding upstream flood risk, and before or during the public hearing process
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client Non-Compliance Insistence — Deferral of Safety Analysis
Source Evidence
Source text
It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case.
Text references
It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case.
anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Third-Party_Upstream_Flood_Risk_Notification_Twenty_Homes a proeth:Third-PartyUpstreamFloodRiskCommunityNotificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Third-Party Upstream Flood Risk Notification Twenty Homes" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case88:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Written_Risk_Notification_Client_B_Tidal_Crossing ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client_Non-Compliance_Insistence_—_Deferral_of_Safety_Analysis> ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case88:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Written_Risk_Notification_Client_B_Tidal_Crossing ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A has identified through professional judgment that the proposed tidal crossing upgrade will materially accelerate uninhabitability of twenty upstream homes, but Client B has directed Engineer A to forgo the specialized analysis that would quantify this risk." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Third-Party_Flood_Risk_Community_Notification_Obligation_Invoked_for_Upstream_Neighborhood ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Third-Party Upstream Flood Risk Community Notification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is obligated to notify the twenty upstream homeowners in writing of the identified risk that the tidal crossing upgrade may accelerate their homes' uninhabitability by a decade or more, based on Engineer A's preliminary professional judgment, so that they can take protective action and participate meaningfully in regulatory proceedings." ;
proeth:sourcetext "It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon Engineer A's formation of the preliminary professional judgment regarding upstream flood risk, and before or during the public hearing process" ;
proeth:textreferences "It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case.",
"anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.856258"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.856258
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction