Engineer A Written Documentation Safety Recommendation Client Refusal Obligation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#Engineer_A_Written_Documentation_Safety_Recommendation_Client_Refusal_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
CoastalRiskAssessmentWrittenDocumentationofSafetyRecommendationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CoastalRiskAssessmentWrittenDocumentationofSafetyRecommendationObligation
Case context
Client A refused to build to the 100-year storm surge elevation on cost grounds, requiring Engineer A to document the recommendation and refusal in writing.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A is obligated to document in writing the 100-year storm surge recommendation, its scientific and professional basis (including the specific data sources and algorithms applied), Client A's refusal to accept the recommendation, and Engineer A's professional objection — so that the record reflects Engineer A's compliance with the paramount public welfare obligation and preserves evidence of the engineer's professional judgment.
Temporal scope
Upon Client A's refusal to accept the 100-year storm surge recommendation
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client Refusal of 100-Year Storm Surge Elevation Recommendation
derivedFromPrinciple
Written Documentation Requirement for Safety Notification Invoked By Engineer A
Source Evidence
Source text
Based on newly released information as well as a recently developed algorithm that includes newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise.
Text references
Based on newly released information as well as a recently developed algorithm that includes newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise.
Because of the increased cost, Owner refuses to agree that the residential development project be built to a 100-year projection storm surge elevation.
TTL
@prefix case87: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case87:Engineer_A_Written_Documentation_Safety_Recommendation_Client_Refusal_Obligation a proeth:CoastalRiskAssessmentWrittenDocumentationofSafetyRecommendationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Written Documentation Safety Recommendation Client Refusal Obligation" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case87:Client_Refusal_of_100-Year_Storm_Surge_Elevation_Recommendation ;
proeth:casecontext "Client A refused to build to the 100-year storm surge elevation on cost grounds, requiring Engineer A to document the recommendation and refusal in writing." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case87:Written_Documentation_Requirement_for_Safety_Notification_Invoked_By_Engineer_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T15:37:08.527715+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T15:37:08.527715+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Coastal Risk Assessment Written Documentation of Safety Recommendation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is obligated to document in writing the 100-year storm surge recommendation, its scientific and professional basis (including the specific data sources and algorithms applied), Client A's refusal to accept the recommendation, and Engineer A's professional objection — so that the record reflects Engineer A's compliance with the paramount public welfare obligation and preserves evidence of the engineer's professional judgment." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Based on newly released information as well as a recently developed algorithm that includes newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon Client A's refusal to accept the 100-year storm surge recommendation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Based on newly released information as well as a recently developed algorithm that includes newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A believes the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation, due to public safety risks even at lower projections of future surge level rise.",
"Because of the increased cost, Owner refuses to agree that the residential development project be built to a 100-year projection storm surge elevation." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 87 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T16:34:23.736304"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 87 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
87
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T15:37:08.527715+00:00
First case
87
Generated
2026-02-27T15:37:08.527715+00:00
Attributed to
Case 87 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T16:34:23.736304
Generated by
ProEthica Case 87 Extraction