Engineer A Coastal Risk Assessment No-Code Jurisdiction Climate Risk Proactive Disclosure

@prefix case87: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case87:Engineer_A_Coastal_Risk_Assessment_No-Code_Jurisdiction_Climate_Risk_Proactive_Disclosure a proeth:No-CodeJurisdictionClimateRiskProactiveDisclosureObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Coastal Risk Assessment No-Code Jurisdiction Climate Risk Proactive Disclosure" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case87:No_Building_Code_Jurisdiction_for_Residential_Development_Project, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#Regulatory_Standard_Climate_Gap_—_No_Code_Jurisdiction> ; proeth:casecontext "The geographic area has no applicable building code governing storm surge elevation; Engineer A identified this regulatory gap as a material public safety concern" ; proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case87:Regulatory_Gap_Awareness_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_Coastal_Case, case87:Regulatory_Gap_Awareness_and_Proactive_Risk_Disclosure_Invoked_By_Engineer_A ; proeth:discoveredincase "87" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T15:43:01.811893+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "87" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T15:43:01.811893+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (coastal risk assessment, present case)" ; proeth:obligationclass "No-Code Jurisdiction Climate Risk Proactive Disclosure Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to proactively disclose to Client A, local government officials, and relevant stakeholders that the geographic area has no applicable building code establishing a minimum enforceable standard protecting future residents from storm surge risk, and that Engineer A's professional judgment establishes a safety-based design standard that exceeds any regulatory minimum, so that decision-makers are not misled into believing that proceeding without a code-mandated standard is equivalent to proceeding safely." ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built." ; proeth:temporalscope "Upon identifying the absence of applicable building codes and before or upon delivery of the coastal risk assessment findings" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has determined, based on historical weather patterns and data, that the residential development project should be built to a 100-year projected storm surge elevation.", "Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 87 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T16:34:23.748065"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 87 Extraction" .