No Building Code Jurisdiction for Residential Development Project
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#No_Building_Code_Jurisdiction_for_Residential_Development_Project
Properties
Instance of
NoBuildingCodeJurisdictionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#NoBuildingCodeJurisdictionState
Active period
Throughout the project design and construction period, until local government adopts updated region-wide building codes
Affected parties
Client A
Engineer A
Future residents
General public in the geographic area
Local government officials
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
The geographic jurisdiction in which the residential development project is located
Terminated by
Adoption of updated region-wide building codes by local government officials
Triggering event
Engineer A's determination that the project is located in a jurisdiction lacking applicable building codes mandating adequate storm surge elevation standards
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built.
Text references
Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built.
TTL
@prefix case87: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/87#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case87:No_Building_Code_Jurisdiction_for_Residential_Development_Project a proeth:NoBuildingCodeJurisdictionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "No Building Code Jurisdiction for Residential Development Project" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Throughout the project design and construction period, until local government adopts updated region-wide building codes" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client A",
"Engineer A",
"Future residents",
"General public in the geographic area",
"Local government officials" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "87" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built." ;
proeth:stateclass "No Building Code Jurisdiction State" ;
proeth:subject "The geographic jurisdiction in which the residential development project is located" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Adoption of updated region-wide building codes by local government officials" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A should also consider contacting local government officials to advocate for the implementation of appropriate and updated region-wide building codes in all jurisdictions for the geographical area where or near where the residential development project is being built." ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's determination that the project is located in a jurisdiction lacking applicable building codes mandating adequate storm surge elevation standards" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 87 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T16:34:23.731249"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 87 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
87
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00
First case
87
Generated
2026-02-27T15:32:20.581418+00:00
Attributed to
Case 87 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T16:34:23.731249
Generated by
ProEthica Case 87 Extraction