Engineer A Safety Obligation Dam Design
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#Engineer_A_Safety_Obligation_Dam_Design
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public by ensuring that the dam drawings and specifications were complete and buildable before submission, given that the public would rely on the dam as a safety-critical structure.
Properties
Instance of
Case context
Engineer A submitted incomplete and partially unbuildable dam drawings and specifications, creating risk to the public who would rely on the dam, without disclosing the deficiencies to any party.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.93
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public by ensuring that the dam drawings and specifications were complete and buildable before submission, given that the public would rely on the dam as a safety-critical structure.
Temporal scope
Throughout the design and submission process
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Safety Obligation'
Matched Ontology Label
Safety Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
prevailsOver
Engineer A Deadline Pressure Resistance Obligation
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Public Welfare Deficient Dam Design
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A generally agrees with Hi-Lo's characterization
much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes
Source text
much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes
TTL
@prefix case85: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/85#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case85:Engineer_A_Safety_Obligation_Dam_Design a proeth:SafetyObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Safety Obligation Dam Design" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case85:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case85:Engineer_A_Deadline_Pressure_Resistance_Obligation ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A submitted incomplete and partially unbuildable dam drawings and specifications, creating risk to the public who would rely on the dam, without disclosing the deficiencies to any party." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case85:Engineer_A_Public_Welfare_Deficient_Dam_Design ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Safety Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public by ensuring that the dam drawings and specifications were complete and buildable before submission, given that the public would rely on the dam as a safety-critical structure." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Throughout the design and submission process" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A generally agrees with Hi-Lo's characterization",
"much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 85 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 85 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Safety Obligation'" ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:SafetyObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Safety Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "much of the design detail is lacking in the drawings and specifications and that Hi-Lo Construction declares that certain parts of the project are 'unbuildable' without major changes" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public by ensuring that the dam drawings and specifications were complete and buildable before submission, given that the public would rely on the dam as a safety-critical structure." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public by ensuring that the dam drawings and specifications were complete and buildable before submission, given that the public would rely on the dam as a safety-critical structure." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 85 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 85 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
85
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00
First case
85
Generated
2026-06-04T16:50:13.568162+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 85 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 85 Extraction