Engineers A B Formal Project Failure Notice
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/76#Engineers_A_B_Formal_Project_Failure_Notice
Definition
Engineers A and B were obligated to formally advise the MWC in writing that the project would not be successful, defined as the public not being endangered, if the water source change proceeded without prior completion of the required corrosion control improvements.
Properties
Instance of
FormalProjectFailureNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#FormalProjectFailureNotificationObligation
Case context
The MWC overruled the joint recommendation to delay the water source change. Engineers A and B identified that proceeding without the required improvements would result in lead exposure to the public. They were required to formally advise the MWC that the project would not achieve safe outcomes.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.86
Obligation statement
Engineers A and B were obligated to formally advise the MWC in writing that the project would not be successful, defined as the public not being endangered, if the water source change proceeded without prior completion of the required corrosion control improvements.
Temporal scope
After the MWC overruled the joint recommendations and before or concurrent with the formal regulatory presentation.
Match Confidence
0.78
Match Reasoning
Via class 'Formal Project Failure Notification Obligation': The existing Project Success Notification Obligation captures the general duty to advise a client when a project will not be successful. This class adds the specific requirement that the notification be formal and documented, which is a meaningful variant warranting a distinct class label while still being closely related to the existing concept.
Matched Ontology Label
Project Success Notification Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A, Agent Engineer B
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineers A B Project Success Notification Principle
Source Evidence
Text references
Again, as with the state regulatory agency, this advisement should proceed in a formal manner.
If project success is defined as 'the public will not be endangered at all,' then Engineers A and B should advise their client that they believe the project will not be successful.
Source text
If project success is defined as 'the public will not be endangered at all,' then Engineers A and B should advise their client that they believe the project will not be successful.
TTL
@prefix case76: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/76#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case76:Engineers_A_B_Formal_Project_Failure_Notice a proeth:FormalProjectFailureNotificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineers A B Formal Project Failure Notice" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case76:Agent_Engineer_A,
case76:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:caseContext "The MWC overruled the joint recommendation to delay the water source change. Engineers A and B identified that proceeding without the required improvements would result in lead exposure to the public. They were required to formally advise the MWC that the project would not achieve safe outcomes." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.86" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case76:Engineers_A_B_Project_Success_Notification_Principle ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineers A and B jointly" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Formal Project Failure Notification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineers A and B were obligated to formally advise the MWC in writing that the project would not be successful, defined as the public not being endangered, if the water source change proceeded without prior completion of the required corrosion control improvements." ;
proeth:temporalScope "After the MWC overruled the joint recommendations and before or concurrent with the formal regulatory presentation." ;
proeth:textReferences "Again, as with the state regulatory agency, this advisement should proceed in a formal manner.",
"If project success is defined as 'the public will not be endangered at all,' then Engineers A and B should advise their client that they believe the project will not be successful." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 76 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-05T11:28:12.343728+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 76 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.78 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Formal Project Failure Notification Obligation': The existing Project Success Notification Obligation captures the general duty to advise a client when a project will not be successful. This class adds the specific requirement that the notification be formal and documented, which is a meaningful variant warranting a distinct class label while still being closely related to the existing concept." ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:ProjectSuccessNotificationObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Project Success Notification Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "If project success is defined as 'the public will not be endangered at all,' then Engineers A and B should advise their client that they believe the project will not be successful." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineers A and B were obligated to formally advise the MWC in writing that the project would not be successful, defined as the public not being endangered, if the water source change proceeded without prior completion of the required corrosion control improvements." ;
skos:definition "Engineers A and B were obligated to formally advise the MWC in writing that the project would not be successful, defined as the public not being endangered, if the water source change proceeded without prior completion of the required corrosion control improvements." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-05T11:28:12.343728+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 76 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 76 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
76
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-05T11:28:12.343728+00:00
First case
76
Generated
2026-06-05T11:28:12.343728+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 76 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 76 Extraction