Engineers A B Project Success Notification
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/76#Engineers_A_B_Project_Success_Notification_Principle
Definition
Engineers A and B advised the MWC that the water source change would not achieve safe outcomes without prior completion of corrosion control improvements, satisfying the project success notification obligation by clearly communicating the conditions under which the project would fail to protect public health.
Properties
Instance of
ProjectSuccessNotificationPrinciple
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProjectSuccessNotificationPrinciple
Applied to
Lead leaching risk from old service pipes
MWC water source change project
Balancing with
Faithful Agent Duty Principle
Concrete expression
Engineers A and B advised the MWC that the water source change would not achieve safe outcomes without prior completion of corrosion control improvements, satisfying the project success notification obligation by clearly communicating the conditions under which the project would fail to protect public health.
Confidence
0.89
Interpretation
The project success notification principle required Engineers A and B to advise the MWC that proceeding without improvements would result in unsafe water quality, and following the override, requires formal written documentation of that notification.
Tension resolution
The project success notification principle is consistent with the faithful agent duty; advising the client of foreseeable failure modes serves the client's genuine interests even when the client rejects the advice.
Match Confidence
0.89
Match Reasoning
Via class 'Project Success Notification Principle': The existing ontology contains 'Project Success Notification Principle' defined as requiring engineers to advise clients when a project will not be successful, including safety outcomes, when the engineer has identified conditions that will result in unsafe outcomes if unaddressed. This matches the obligation of Engineers A and B to advise the MWC that proceeding without improvements will result in unsafe water quality.
Matched Ontology Label
Project Success Notification Principle
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
appliedTo
balancingWith
concreteExpression
confidence
interpretation
principleClass
tensionResolution
textReferences
Relationships
invokedBy
Agent Engineer A, Agent Engineer B
Source Evidence
Text references
Both Engineer A and Engineer B met with the MWC at a meeting sparsely attended by the public and recommended that the change in water source be substantially delayed until improvements could be completed.
The improvements are needed prior to the change in water source to ensure that sufficient corrosion control is provided so that old service pipes in the MWC service area don't leach lead at levels in excess of drinking water standards.
Source text
Both Engineer A and Engineer B met with the MWC at a meeting sparsely attended by the public and recommended that the change in water source be substantially delayed until improvements could be completed.
TTL
@prefix case76: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/76#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case76:Engineers_A_B_Project_Success_Notification_Principle a proeth:ProjectSuccessNotificationPrinciple,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineers A B Project Success Notification" ;
proeth-core:invokedBy case76:Agent_Engineer_A,
case76:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:appliedTo "Lead leaching risk from old service pipes",
"MWC water source change project" ;
proeth:balancingWith "Faithful Agent Duty Principle" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteExpression "Engineers A and B advised the MWC that the water source change would not achieve safe outcomes without prior completion of corrosion control improvements, satisfying the project success notification obligation by clearly communicating the conditions under which the project would fail to protect public health." ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:interpretation "The project success notification principle required Engineers A and B to advise the MWC that proceeding without improvements would result in unsafe water quality, and following the override, requires formal written documentation of that notification." ;
proeth:invokedBy "Engineer A Safety Reporting",
"Engineer B Safety Reporting" ;
proeth:principleClass "Project Success Notification Principle" ;
proeth:tensionResolution "The project success notification principle is consistent with the faithful agent duty; advising the client of foreseeable failure modes serves the client's genuine interests even when the client rejects the advice." ;
proeth:textReferences "Both Engineer A and Engineer B met with the MWC at a meeting sparsely attended by the public and recommended that the change in water source be substantially delayed until improvements could be completed.",
"The improvements are needed prior to the change in water source to ensure that sufficient corrosion control is provided so that old service pipes in the MWC service area don't leach lead at levels in excess of drinking water standards." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 76 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-05T11:22:15.977522+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 76 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.89 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Project Success Notification Principle': The existing ontology contains 'Project Success Notification Principle' defined as requiring engineers to advise clients when a project will not be successful, including safety outcomes, when the engineer has identified conditions that will result in unsafe outcomes if unaddressed. This matches the obligation of Engineers A and B to advise the MWC that proceeding without improvements will result in unsafe water quality." ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:ProjectSuccessNotificationPrinciple ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Project Success Notification Principle" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Both Engineer A and Engineer B met with the MWC at a meeting sparsely attended by the public and recommended that the change in water source be substantially delayed until improvements could be completed." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "appliedTo",
"balancingWith",
"concreteExpression",
"confidence",
"interpretation",
"principleClass",
"tensionResolution",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineers A and B advised the MWC that the water source change would not achieve safe outcomes without prior completion of corrosion control improvements, satisfying the project success notification obligation by clearly communicating the conditions under which the project would fail to protect public health." ;
skos:definition "Engineers A and B advised the MWC that the water source change would not achieve safe outcomes without prior completion of corrosion control improvements, satisfying the project success notification obligation by clearly communicating the conditions under which the project would fail to protect public health." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-05T11:22:15.977522+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 76 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 76 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
76
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-05T11:22:15.977522+00:00
First case
76
Generated
2026-06-05T11:22:15.977522+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 76 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 76 Extraction