Engineer B Investigative Completeness
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#Engineer_B_Investigative_Completeness
Definition
Engineer B was obligated to consult available witnesses, review pile driving records, and pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry before reaching conclusions about the adequacy of the 19 piles.
Properties
Instance of
InvestigativeCompletenessObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#InvestigativeCompletenessObligation
Case context
Engineer B was retained by the municipality to supervise test pile driving and produce a findings report on whether the original 90 piles met design safety factors. Engineer B reached conclusions without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives or reviewing pile driving records.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.93
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to consult available witnesses, review pile driving records, and pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry before reaching conclusions about the adequacy of the 19 piles.
Temporal scope
During preparation of the investigative report, prior to issuing conclusions
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer B
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer B Investigative Completeness Failure
Source Evidence
Text references
At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records.
No effort was made by Engineer B to inquire from contractors, workers, or others on the job to verify or refute his theories about why the 19 piles met driving refusal prior to predicted depth.
Source text
At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records.
TTL
@prefix case71: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case71:Engineer_B_Investigative_Completeness a proeth:InvestigativeCompletenessObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Investigative Completeness" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case71:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer B was retained by the municipality to supervise test pile driving and produce a findings report on whether the original 90 piles met design safety factors. Engineer B reached conclusions without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives or reviewing pile driving records." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case71:Engineer_B_Investigative_Completeness_Failure ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Investigative Completeness Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer B was obligated to consult available witnesses, review pile driving records, and pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry before reaching conclusions about the adequacy of the 19 piles." ;
proeth:temporalScope "During preparation of the investigative report, prior to issuing conclusions" ;
proeth:textReferences "At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records.",
"No effort was made by Engineer B to inquire from contractors, workers, or others on the job to verify or refute his theories about why the 19 piles met driving refusal prior to predicted depth." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T14:31:15.630641+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer B was obligated to consult available witnesses, review pile driving records, and pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry before reaching conclusions about the adequacy of the 19 piles." ;
skos:definition "Engineer B was obligated to consult available witnesses, review pile driving records, and pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry before reaching conclusions about the adequacy of the 19 piles." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T14:31:15.630641+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 71 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 71 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
71
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T14:31:15.630641+00:00
First case
71
Generated
2026-06-04T14:31:15.630641+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 71 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 71 Extraction