Engineer B Investigative Completeness Failure
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#Engineer_B_Investigative_Completeness_Failure
Definition
Engineer B reached conclusions about the adequacy of 19 piles without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives, reviewing pile driving records, or inquiring of contractors and workers who could have verified or refuted the theories underlying those conclusions.
Properties
Instance of
InvestigativeCompletenessPrinciple
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#InvestigativeCompletenessPrinciple
Applied to
Test pile investigation report on adequacy of 90-pile foundation
Balancing with
Contractual scope of work as defined by the municipality
Concrete expression
Engineer B reached conclusions about the adequacy of 19 piles without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives, reviewing pile driving records, or inquiring of contractors and workers who could have verified or refuted the theories underlying those conclusions.
Confidence
0.92
Interpretation
The principle was violated: Engineer B's investigation was incomplete because available and material evidence sources were not consulted before conclusions were finalized and reported.
Tension resolution
Engineer B's post-hoc explanation that reviewing pile driving records was not in the scope of work does not discharge the professional obligation to pursue available evidence material to the conclusions being drawn.
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
appliedTo
balancingWith
concreteExpression
confidence
interpretation
principleClass
tensionResolution
textReferences
Relationships
invokedBy
Agent Engineer B
Source Evidence
Text references
At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records.
No effort was made by Engineer B to inquire from contractors, workers, or others on the job to verify or refute his theories about why the 19 piles met driving refusal prior to predicted depth.
Previously, Engineer B had said, 'We didn't look at the pile driving records because it was not in our scope of work.'
Source text
At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records.
TTL
@prefix case71: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case71:Engineer_B_Investigative_Completeness_Failure a proeth:InvestigativeCompletenessPrinciple,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Investigative Completeness Failure" ;
proeth-core:invokedBy case71:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:appliedTo "Test pile investigation report on adequacy of 90-pile foundation" ;
proeth:balancingWith "Contractual scope of work as defined by the municipality" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteExpression "Engineer B reached conclusions about the adequacy of 19 piles without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives, reviewing pile driving records, or inquiring of contractors and workers who could have verified or refuted the theories underlying those conclusions." ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:interpretation "The principle was violated: Engineer B's investigation was incomplete because available and material evidence sources were not consulted before conclusions were finalized and reported." ;
proeth:invokedBy "Engineer B Litigation Expert" ;
proeth:principleClass "Investigative Completeness Principle" ;
proeth:tensionResolution "Engineer B's post-hoc explanation that reviewing pile driving records was not in the scope of work does not discharge the professional obligation to pursue available evidence material to the conclusions being drawn." ;
proeth:textReferences "At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records.",
"No effort was made by Engineer B to inquire from contractors, workers, or others on the job to verify or refute his theories about why the 19 piles met driving refusal prior to predicted depth.",
"Previously, Engineer B had said, 'We didn't look at the pile driving records because it was not in our scope of work.'" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T14:30:07.628947+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "At no time during the development of Engineer B's report did Engineer B talk to any representative of Engineer A, even though Engineer A's on-site representatives were available to testify as to the accuracy of the pile driving records." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "appliedTo",
"balancingWith",
"concreteExpression",
"confidence",
"interpretation",
"principleClass",
"tensionResolution",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer B reached conclusions about the adequacy of 19 piles without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives, reviewing pile driving records, or inquiring of contractors and workers who could have verified or refuted the theories underlying those conclusions." ;
skos:definition "Engineer B reached conclusions about the adequacy of 19 piles without consulting Engineer A's on-site representatives, reviewing pile driving records, or inquiring of contractors and workers who could have verified or refuted the theories underlying those conclusions." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T14:30:07.628947+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 71 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 71 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
71
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T14:30:07.628947+00:00
First case
71
Generated
2026-06-04T14:30:07.628947+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 71 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 71 Extraction