Dock Foundation Public Safety Risk
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#Dock_Foundation_Public_Safety_Risk
Definition
Structural adequacy of the 90-pile dock foundation
Properties
Instance of
Active period
From the time Engineer B's report identified 19 potentially non-conforming piles through resolution of the dispute
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Municipality
Public users of the dock
Confidence
0.85
Principle Transformation
Transforms the general duty of objectivity and thoroughness into a specific obligation to actively seek out and consider available material information before issuing professional conclusions.
Subject
Structural adequacy of the 90-pile dock foundation
Terminated by
Not resolved within the case facts presented
Triggering event
Expert testimony and Engineer B's report raised questions about whether 19 of 90 piles met the safety factor required by design calculations
Urgency level
high
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Public Safety at Risk'
Matched Ontology Label
Public Safety at Risk
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatedByEvent
Pile Resistance Shortfall
activatesObligation
Engineer B Fact Gathering Diligence
terminatedByEvent
Report Issued
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations.
Source text
Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations.
TTL
@prefix case71: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/71#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case71:Dock_Foundation_Public_Safety_Risk a proeth:PublicSafetyatRisk,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Dock Foundation Public Safety Risk" ;
proeth-core:activatedByEvent case71:Pile_Resistance_Shortfall ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case71:Engineer_B_Fact_Gathering_Diligence ;
proeth-core:affects case71:Agent_Engineer_A,
case71:Agent_Engineer_B,
case71:Agent_Municipality ;
proeth-core:terminatedByEvent case71:Report_Issued ;
proeth:activePeriod "From the time Engineer B's report identified 19 potentially non-conforming piles through resolution of the dispute" ;
proeth:affectedParties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Municipality",
"Public users of the dock" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms the general duty of objectivity and thoroughness into a specific obligation to actively seek out and consider available material information before issuing professional conclusions." ;
proeth:stateClass "Public Safety at Risk" ;
proeth:subject "Structural adequacy of the 90-pile dock foundation" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Not resolved within the case facts presented" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations." ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "Expert testimony and Engineer B's report raised questions about whether 19 of 90 piles met the safety factor required by design calculations" ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "high" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T14:26:51.674939+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 71 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Public Safety at Risk'" ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:PublicSafetyAtRisk ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Public Safety at Risk" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer B's concluding report stated that approximately 19 of the 90 piles did not meet the safety factor required by the design calculations." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "Structural adequacy of the 90-pile dock foundation" ;
skos:definition "Structural adequacy of the 90-pile dock foundation" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T14:26:51.674939+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 71 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 71 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
71
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T14:26:51.674939+00:00
First case
71
Generated
2026-06-04T14:26:51.674939+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 71 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 71 Extraction