Engineer A Responsible Charge

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge
Definition

Bore formal responsible charge over the AI-assisted design documents and contaminant report, but conducted only a high-level review of AI-generated engineering plans, failing to satisfy the active engagement and supervisory control requirements of responsible charge, resulting in undetected dimensional errors and omitted safety features.


Bore formal responsible charge over the AI-assisted design documents and contaminant report, but conducted only a high-level review of AI-generated engineering plans, failing to satisfy the active engagement and supervisory control requirements of responsible charge, resulting in undetected dimensional errors and omitted safety features.

Properties
Instance of
ResponsibleChargeEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ResponsibleChargeEngineer
Actor
Engineer A
Confidence
0.88
Has License
Professional Engineer
Has Specialty
Environmental engineering
Other Attribute
responsible_charge_status: Deficient under NSPE Position Statement No. 10-1778
Role category
provider_client
Match Confidence
0.72
Match Reasoning
Via class 'Responsible Charge Engineer': Responsible Charge Engineer is a specialization of Engineer Role, distinguished by the formal licensure-law concept of responsible charge, which imposes active engagement and supervisory control obligations beyond general engineering practice. No existing extracted class captures this specific licensure-based accountability framing.
Matched Ontology Label
Engineer Role
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseInvolvement
confidence
roleCategory
roleClass
textReferences
Source Evidence
Text references
By relying on AI-assisted tools without a comprehensive verification process of its output, Engineer A risked violating this requirement
Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law
Engineer A, as the engineer in Responsible Charge of the project, is required to provide an experienced-based quality assurance review, engaging in critical discussions, mentorship, and professional development

Source text
Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law
TTL
@prefix case7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case7:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge a proeth:ResponsibleChargeEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Responsible Charge" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case7:Engineer_A_Mentor_Loss_Response_Principle, case7:Engineer_A_Mentorship_Loss_Design_Oversight, case7:Engineer_A_Public_Safety_Design_Errors, case7:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Design_Failure, case7:Engineer_A_Safety_Feature_Omission_Principle, case7:Engineer_A_Seal_on_AI_Design_Documents ; proeth-core:hasObligation case7:Engineer_A_Design_Responsible_Charge, case7:Engineer_A_Design_Safety_Compliance, case7:Engineer_A_Design_Seal, case7:Engineer_A_Mentor_Loss_Response, case7:Engineer_A_Safety_Feature_Omission ; proeth:actor "Engineer A" ; proeth:caseInvolvement "Bore formal responsible charge over the AI-assisted design documents and contaminant report, but conducted only a high-level review of AI-generated engineering plans, failing to satisfy the active engagement and supervisory control requirements of responsible charge, resulting in undetected dimensional errors and omitted safety features." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:hasLicense "Professional Engineer" ; proeth:hasSpecialty "Environmental engineering" ; proeth:otherAttribute "responsible_charge_status: Deficient under NSPE Position Statement No. 10-1778" ; proeth:roleCategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleClass "Responsible Charge Engineer" ; proeth:textReferences "By relying on AI-assisted tools without a comprehensive verification process of its output, Engineer A risked violating this requirement", "Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law", "Engineer A, as the engineer in Responsible Charge of the project, is required to provide an experienced-based quality assurance review, engaging in critical discussions, mentorship, and professional development" ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 7 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-03T14:00:40.742585+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 7 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.72 ; proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Responsible Charge Engineer': Responsible Charge Engineer is a specialization of Engineer Role, distinguished by the formal licensure-law concept of responsible charge, which imposes active engagement and supervisory control obligations beyond general engineering practice. No existing extracted class captures this specific licensure-based accountability framing." ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:EngineerRole ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Engineer Role" ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ; proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law" ; proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseInvolvement", "confidence", "roleCategory", "roleClass", "textReferences" ; rdfs:comment "Bore formal responsible charge over the AI-assisted design documents and contaminant report, but conducted only a high-level review of AI-generated engineering plans, failing to satisfy the active engagement and supervisory control requirements of responsible charge, resulting in undetected dimensional errors and omitted safety features." ; skos:definition "Bore formal responsible charge over the AI-assisted design documents and contaminant report, but conducted only a high-level review of AI-generated engineering plans, failing to satisfy the active engagement and supervisory control requirements of responsible charge, resulting in undetected dimensional errors and omitted safety features." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-03T14:00:40.742585+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 7 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 7 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-06-05 09:38
Discovered in case
7
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-03T14:00:40.742585+00:00
First case
7
Generated
2026-06-03T14:00:40.742585+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 7 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction