Engineer A Design Responsible Charge

@prefix case7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case7:Engineer_A_Design_Responsible_Charge a proeth:ResponsibleChargeVerificationObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Design Responsible Charge" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case7:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Deficit ; proeth-core:obligatedParty case7:Agent_Engineer_A ; proeth:caseContext "Engineer A sealed and submitted AI-generated design documents after only a high-level review, without substantive involvement in the design and development process, resulting in omitted safety features and misaligned dimensions." ; proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case7:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Design_Failure ; proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationClass "Responsible Charge Verification Obligation" ; proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to conduct a comprehensive, experience-based verification of the AI-generated design documents with active involvement in the design and development process before sealing and submitting them." ; proeth:temporalScope "During preparation and prior to sealing and submission of the design documents" ; proeth:textReferences "Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law which violates Code section III.8.a.", "Engineer A's oversight of engineering plans was inadequate, raising ethical concerns. AI-generated technical work requires at least the same level of scrutiny as human-created work.", "Reviewing drawings or documents after preparation without involvement in the design and development process does not satisfy the definition of Responsible Charge." ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 7 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-03T14:09:34.826300+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 7 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.82 ; proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Responsible Charge Verification Obligation': This obligation is closely related to the already-extracted Responsible Charge Seal Obligation but emphasizes the verification and active-involvement dimension rather than the sealing act itself. It is a variant of that class focusing on the process of responsible charge rather than the sealing act." ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:ResponsibleChargeSealObligation ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Responsible Charge Seal Obligation" ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ; proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law which violates Code section III.8.a." ; proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext", "complianceStatus", "confidence", "obligationClass", "obligationStatement", "temporalScope", "textReferences" ; rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to conduct a comprehensive, experience-based verification of the AI-generated design documents with active involvement in the design and development process before sealing and submitting them." ; skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to conduct a comprehensive, experience-based verification of the AI-generated design documents with active involvement in the design and development process before sealing and submitting them." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-03T14:09:34.826300+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 7 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 7 Extraction" .