Engineer A Responsible Charge Deficit
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Deficit
Definition
Engineer A's failure to maintain active supervisory direction and control over AI-generated design documents, relying on post-preparation review rather than engagement throughout the design process
Properties
Instance of
ResponsibleChargeDeficitState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ResponsibleChargeDeficitState
Active period
From Engineer A's use of the AI drafting tool through the submission of deficient design documents; persists until responsible charge obligations are properly satisfied
Affected parties
Client W
Engineer A
public safety
Confidence
0.9
Principle Transformation
Transforms the responsible charge and public safety principles into a concrete prohibition on passive post-hoc review as a substitute for active supervisory engagement throughout the engineering process.
Subject
Engineer A's failure to maintain active supervisory direction and control over AI-generated design documents, relying on post-preparation review rather than engagement throughout the design process
Terminated by
Would require Engineer A to re-engage with comprehensive verification and active supervisory direction; not resolved within the case facts
Triggering event
Engineer A sealing and submitting AI-generated design documents reviewed only at a high level without active involvement in the design and development process
Urgency level
high
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatedByEvent
AI Design Generation
activatesConstraint
Engineer A AI Judgment Substitution
activatesObligation
Engineer A Design Safety Compliance, Engineer A Design Seal
affects
Agent Client W, Agent Engineer A
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law which violates Code section III.8.a.
Engineer A, as the engineer in Responsible Charge of the project, is required to provide an experienced-based quality assurance review, engaging in critical discussions, mentorship, and professional development.
Reviewing drawings or documents after preparation without involvement in the design and development process does not satisfy the definition of Responsible Charge.
Source text
Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law which violates Code section III.8.a.
TTL
@prefix case7: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/7#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case7:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Deficit a proeth:ResponsibleChargeDeficitState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Responsible Charge Deficit" ;
proeth-core:activatedByEvent case7:AI_Design_Generation ;
proeth-core:activatesConstraint case7:Engineer_A_AI_Judgment_Substitution ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case7:Engineer_A_Design_Safety_Compliance,
case7:Engineer_A_Design_Seal ;
proeth-core:affects case7:Agent_Client_W,
case7:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:activePeriod "From Engineer A's use of the AI drafting tool through the submission of deficient design documents; persists until responsible charge obligations are properly satisfied" ;
proeth:affectedParties "Client W",
"Engineer A",
"public safety" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms the responsible charge and public safety principles into a concrete prohibition on passive post-hoc review as a substitute for active supervisory engagement throughout the engineering process." ;
proeth:stateClass "Responsible Charge Deficit State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's failure to maintain active supervisory direction and control over AI-generated design documents, relying on post-preparation review rather than engagement throughout the design process" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Would require Engineer A to re-engage with comprehensive verification and active supervisory direction; not resolved within the case facts" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law which violates Code section III.8.a.",
"Engineer A, as the engineer in Responsible Charge of the project, is required to provide an experienced-based quality assurance review, engaging in critical discussions, mentorship, and professional development.",
"Reviewing drawings or documents after preparation without involvement in the design and development process does not satisfy the definition of Responsible Charge." ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "Engineer A sealing and submitting AI-generated design documents reviewed only at a high level without active involvement in the design and development process" ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "high" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 7 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-03T14:01:36.958645+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 7 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A did not maintain responsible charge in violation of licensure law which violates Code section III.8.a." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A's failure to maintain active supervisory direction and control over AI-generated design documents, relying on post-preparation review rather than engagement throughout the design process" ;
skos:definition "Engineer A's failure to maintain active supervisory direction and control over AI-generated design documents, relying on post-preparation review rather than engagement throughout the design process" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-03T14:01:36.958645+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 7 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 7 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
7
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-03T14:01:36.958645+00:00
First case
7
Generated
2026-06-03T14:01:36.958645+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 7 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 7 Extraction