BER-82-4 Engineer A Multi-Role Review-Recommendation Non-Decision Boundary

@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case177:BER-82-4_Engineer_A_Multi-Role_Review-Recommendation_Non-Decision_Boundary a proeth:Review-RecommendationNon-DecisionDual-RolePermissibilityBoundaryObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "BER-82-4 Engineer A Multi-Role Review-Recommendation Non-Decision Boundary" ; proeth-core:competesWith case177:Firm_A_City-Retained_Engineer_Multi-Role_Conflict_Non-Engagement ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Firm_A_Multi-Role_Structural_Conflict_—_Design_Review_and_Inspection_for_Same_Parties> ; proeth:casecontext "BER Case 82-4: Engineer A in full-time private practice retained by county and city for engineering roles, also serving as project administrator for airport authority and city block grant program, while retained as consultant by private firms to develop city and county project proposals." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case177:Review-Recommendation_vs_Decision_Distinction_Applied_in_BER_82-4 ; proeth:discoveredincase "177" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (BER 82-4)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Review-Recommendation Non-Decision Dual-Role Permissibility Boundary Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A, serving simultaneously as county engineer, city engineer, airport authority project administrator, and city block grant administrator while also providing private consulting services, was obligated to ensure that his activities in public roles remained within the review-and-recommendation category rather than constituting final decisions on matters in which he had a private interest." ; proeth:sourcetext "The Board found that Engineer A did not actually participate in 'decisions' with respect to services solicited or provided by him or his organization in private or public engineering practice but rather reviewed, recommended, formulated, and oversaw plans." ; proeth:temporalscope "Throughout all concurrent public and private engagements" ; proeth:textreferences "The Board found that Engineer A did not actually participate in 'decisions' with respect to services solicited or provided by him or his organization in private or public engineering practice but rather reviewed, recommended, formulated, and oversaw plans.", "The Board found that his activities were within the meaning of the amended Code provisions and did not constitute 'decisions' under Section II.4.d.", "Therefore the Board concluded that one who serves as both city and county engineer for a retainer fee may provide private engineering consulting services to the city and county." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.780793"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .