Owner Loyalty Claim Against Engineer A's Impartial Determination
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/176#Owner_Loyalty_Claim_Against_Engineer_As_Impartial_Determination
Properties
Instance of
ClientLoyaltyClaimOverridingContractualImpartialityState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientLoyaltyClaimOverridingContractualImpartialityState
Active period
From Owner's acceptance of Engineer A's determination through Owner's criticism invoking loyalty duty
Affected parties
Engineer A
Owner
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Owner's post-determination assertion that Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty required a client-favorable outcome regardless of contractual and technical merits
Terminated by
Not resolved within the case facts; persists as an open ethical challenge
Triggering event
Owner accepting Engineer A's determination but criticizing Engineer A for not finding in Owner's favor on loyalty grounds
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor
Text references
Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor
TTL
@prefix case176: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/176#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case176:Owner_Loyalty_Claim_Against_Engineer_As_Impartial_Determination a proeth:ClientLoyaltyClaimOverridingContractualImpartialityState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Owner Loyalty Claim Against Engineer A's Impartial Determination" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Owner's acceptance of Engineer A's determination through Owner's criticism invoking loyalty duty" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Owner" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "176" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:57:00.276729+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "176" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:57:00.276729+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client Loyalty Claim Overriding Contractual Impartiality State" ;
proeth:subject "Owner's post-determination assertion that Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty required a client-favorable outcome regardless of contractual and technical merits" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not resolved within the case facts; persists as an open ethical challenge" ;
proeth:textreferences "Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Owner accepting Engineer A's determination but criticizing Engineer A for not finding in Owner's favor on loyalty grounds" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 176 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T11:13:16.194641"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 176 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
176
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:57:00.276729+00:00
First case
176
Generated
2026-03-01T10:57:00.276729+00:00
Attributed to
Case 176 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T11:13:16.194641
Generated by
ProEthica Case 176 Extraction