Client Loyalty Claim Overriding Contractual Impartiality State
Class
f3cba777
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientLoyaltyClaimOverridingContractualImpartialityState
Definition
State in which a client, after accepting an engineer's impartial determination adverse to the client's position, retroactively asserts that the engineer's ethical duty of loyalty required the engineer to find in the client's favor regardless of the technical and contractual merits — conflating the faithful-agent duty with an obligation of unconditional partisan advocacy and mischaracterizing the scope of professional loyalty obligations.
Properties
Subclass of
Definition
State in which a client, after accepting an engineer's impartial determination adverse to the client's position, retroactively asserts that the engineer's ethical duty of loyalty required the engineer to find in the client's favor regardless of the technical and contractual merits — conflating the faithful-agent duty with an obligation of unconditional partisan advocacy and mischaracterizing the scope of professional loyalty obligations.
Scope Note
[proethica-intermediate-extended] State in which a professional engineer's post-engagement obligations to a former client are being evaluated to determine whether the 'faithful agent and trustee' standard imposes a duty of absolute, perpetual loyalty that would bar the engineer from ever taking a position adverse to that former client's interests in any matter — even one entirely unrelated to prior services. The state is resolved when the applicable code or reviewing body determines that no such absolute duty exists, and that the engineer retains professional autonomy and independence to accept engagements adverse to former clients in unrelated matters, subject to disclosure obligations and the absence of confidential information conflicts.
Source Evidence
Source Text
Owner accepts Engineer A's interpretation, but also criticizes Engineer A, claiming that because of Engineer A's ethical duty of loyalty to the Owner, Engineer A should have found in Owner's favor
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_intermediate_extended: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate-extended> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientLoyaltyClaimOverridingContractualImpartialityState> a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Client Loyalty Claim Overriding Contractual Impartiality State" ;
rdfs:comment "State in which a client, after accepting an engineer's impartial determination adverse to the client's position, retroactively asserts that the engineer's ethical duty of loyalty required the engineer to find in the client's favor regardless of the technical and contractual merits — conflating the faithful-agent duty with an obligation of unconditional partisan advocacy and mischaracterizing the scope of professional loyalty obligations." ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#State> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Class
Content Hash
f3cba77749fd9be1...Last Updated
2026-03-12 16:49
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
176
Discovered In Pass
1
Discovered In Section
facts
First Discovered At
2026-03-01T10:57:00.276729+00:00
First Discovered In Case
176
Generated
2026-03-01T10:57:00.276729+00:00
Was Attributed To
Case 176 Extraction