Engineer B Notice-Period Active-Negotiation Key-Employee Departure Disclosure BER-82

@prefix case171: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case171:Engineer_B_Notice-Period_Active-Negotiation_Key-Employee_Departure_Disclosure_BER-82 a proeth:Notice-PeriodActive-NegotiationKey-EmployeeDepartureDisclosureObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer B Notice-Period Active-Negotiation Key-Employee Departure Disclosure BER-82" ; proeth-core:competesWith case171:Engineer_B_Pertinent_Fact_Dual-Element_Misrepresentation_Test_Brochure_BER-82, case171:Engineer_B_Post-Actual-Departure_Brochure_Cessation_Absolute_BER-82 ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case171:Engineer_B_Post-Departure_Brochure_Continued_Use, case171:Engineer_B_Post-Termination_Brochure_Continued_Use ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer B issued a termination notice to Engineer A in November 1982 but continued distributing a brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee. During the interim period before Engineer A's actual departure, Engineer B was obligated to disclose Engineer A's pending departure during active client negotiations, though not required to insert formal addenda in every brochure copy." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.93" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case171:Brochure_Personnel_Currency_Disclosure_During_Active_Negotiation_Obligation_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Notice_Period, case171:Brochure_Personnel_Currency_Disclosure_Obligation_Violated_by_Engineer_B ; proeth:discoveredincase "171" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:40:34.949168+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "171" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:40:34.949168+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ; proeth:obligationclass "Notice-Period Active-Negotiation Key-Employee Departure Disclosure Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated, during active negotiations with prospective clients occurring between the date of Engineer A's termination notice and Engineer A's actual departure, to inform those prospective clients of Engineer A's pending termination." ; proeth:sourcetext "We do believe that during the interim period between Engineer A's being given notice of termination and his actual cessation of employment, Engineer B had an obligation, during negotiations with a prospective client, to inform the client of Engineer A's pending termination." ; proeth:temporalscope "From issuance of termination notice (November 1982) through Engineer A's actual departure date" ; proeth:textreferences "That could easily mislead potential clients into believing that Engineer A, noted as a key employee, would be available in the firm for consultation on future projects.", "We do believe that during the interim period between Engineer A's being given notice of termination and his actual cessation of employment, Engineer B had an obligation, during negotiations with a prospective client, to inform the client of Engineer A's pending termination.", "a requirement that Engineer B insert an addendum or an amendment in the brochure informing prospective clients that Engineer A would soon be leaving the firm is both impracticable and unnecessary." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 171 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:51:15.262519"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 171 Extraction" .