Engineer B Review Conducted With Engineer A's Knowledge
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Review_Conducted_With_Engineer_As_Knowledge
Properties
Instance of
Post-OccupancyDesignAdequacyDisputeState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-OccupancyDesignAdequacyDisputeState
Active period
From the time Engineer B was retained through the ethics board's analysis
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
New Owner
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer B's review engagement and Engineer A's awareness of it
Terminated by
Ethics board resolution affirming Engineer B's conduct was ethical
Triggering event
New owner retaining Engineer B to conduct an engineering inspection of the facility, with Engineer A's knowledge
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility and that the resulting evaluation would necessarily entail a review of the original designs
Text references
Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility and that the resulting evaluation would necessarily entail a review of the original designs
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Review_Conducted_With_Engineer_As_Knowledge a proeth:Post-OccupancyDesignAdequacyDisputeState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Review Conducted With Engineer A's Knowledge" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the time Engineer B was retained through the ethics board's analysis" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"New Owner" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility and that the resulting evaluation would necessarily entail a review of the original designs" ;
proeth:stateclass "Post-Occupancy Design Adequacy Dispute State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer B's review engagement and Engineer A's awareness of it" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Ethics board resolution affirming Engineer B's conduct was ethical" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility and that the resulting evaluation would necessarily entail a review of the original designs" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "New owner retaining Engineer B to conduct an engineering inspection of the facility, with Engineer A's knowledge" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.039015"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.039015
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction