Engineer A AV Risk Assessment Team Harm Minimization Participation Obligation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/165#Engineer_A_AV_Risk_Assessment_Team_Harm_Minimization_Participation_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
AutonomousVehicleHarmMinimizationRiskManagementParticipationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AutonomousVehicleHarmMinimizationRiskManagementParticipationObligation
Case context
Engineer A is a professional engineer serving as a consultant to an automobile manufacturer and assigned to an engineering risk assessment team evaluating scenarios for a driverless/autonomous vehicle operating system, including the scenario of how the system should handle unavoidable crashes involving passengers versus third parties.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A, as a member of the automobile manufacturer's engineering risk assessment team, was obligated to fully and actively participate in the evaluation of the crash-avoidance algorithm's harm-distribution logic, to express clearly and unambiguously any concerns regarding the safety of the operating system's harm-minimization framework, and if necessary to recommend further study before the operating system is deployed for public use.
Temporal scope
During the risk assessment process, before any recommendation is finalized and before the operating system is deployed
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer A AV Moral Framework Public Transparency Recommendation Obligation, Engineer A AV Risk Assessment Third-Party Safety Consideration Obligation
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team whose members are being asked to make a recommendation relating to potential situations that could arise in connection with the operation of driverless/autonomous vehicles
Text references
Engineer A is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team whose members are being asked to make a recommendation relating to potential situations that could arise in connection with the operation of driverless/autonomous vehicles
TTL
@prefix case165: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/165#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case165:Engineer_A_AV_Risk_Assessment_Team_Harm_Minimization_Participation_Obligation a proeth:AutonomousVehicleHarmMinimizationRiskManagementParticipationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A AV Risk Assessment Team Harm Minimization Participation Obligation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case165:Engineer_A_AV_Moral_Framework_Public_Transparency_Recommendation_Obligation,
case165:Engineer_A_AV_Risk_Assessment_Third-Party_Safety_Consideration_Obligation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case165:Autonomous_Vehicle_Ethics_Regulatory_Standards_Vacuum,
case165:Passenger_Safety_vs._Third-Party_Harm_Minimization_Algorithm_Conflict ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A is a professional engineer serving as a consultant to an automobile manufacturer and assigned to an engineering risk assessment team evaluating scenarios for a driverless/autonomous vehicle operating system, including the scenario of how the system should handle unavoidable crashes involving passengers versus third parties." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case165:Active_Risk_Assessment_Team_Participation_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A,
case165:Algorithmic_Harm_Distribution_Ethics_Invoked_in_Autonomous_Vehicle_Case ;
proeth:discoveredincase "165" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T23:27:21.726838+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "165" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T23:27:21.726838+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Autonomous Vehicle Harm Minimization Risk Management Participation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A, as a member of the automobile manufacturer's engineering risk assessment team, was obligated to fully and actively participate in the evaluation of the crash-avoidance algorithm's harm-distribution logic, to express clearly and unambiguously any concerns regarding the safety of the operating system's harm-minimization framework, and if necessary to recommend further study before the operating system is deployed for public use." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team whose members are being asked to make a recommendation relating to potential situations that could arise in connection with the operation of driverless/autonomous vehicles" ;
proeth:temporalscope "During the risk assessment process, before any recommendation is finalized and before the operating system is deployed" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team whose members are being asked to make a recommendation relating to potential situations that could arise in connection with the operation of driverless/autonomous vehicles" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 165 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T23:40:57.918153"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 165 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
165
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T23:27:21.726838+00:00
First case
165
Generated
2026-02-27T23:27:21.726838+00:00
Attributed to
Case 165 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T23:40:57.918153
Generated by
ProEthica Case 165 Extraction