Engineer A Detailed Review Sufficiency Standard Violation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/163#Engineer_A_Detailed_Review_Sufficiency_Standard_Violation
Properties
Instance of
DetailedReviewSufficiencyStandardforSupervisorySealingObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#DetailedReviewSufficiencyStandardforSupervisorySealingObligation
Case context
Engineer A's self-described supervisory practice of establishing concepts, setting design requirements, reviewing design elements as the project progresses, and answering technical questions does not constitute the detailed review required before sealing.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to conduct a detailed, substantive review and check of plans prepared by subordinate registered and non-registered engineers as a prerequisite to sealing those plans, recognizing that general direction and supervision alone — without detailed review — is insufficient to satisfy the responsible charge requirement.
Temporal scope
Prior to each act of affixing his professional seal to subordinate-prepared plans
Relationships
prevailsOver
Engineer A Organizational Scale Non-Excuse Responsible Charge Sealing, Engineer A Organizational Scale Non-Excuse Violation
derivedFromPrinciple
Detailed Review Sufficiency Standard Invoked Against Engineer A Sealing Practice
Source Evidence
Source text
By general direction and supervision, Engineer A means that he is involved in helping to establish the concept, the design requirements, and review elements of the design or project status as the design progresses.
Text references
By general direction and supervision, Engineer A means that he is involved in helping to establish the concept, the design requirements, and review elements of the design or project status as the design progresses.
Engineer A finds it impossible to give a detailed review or check of the design.
Engineer A is consulted about technical questions and he provides answers and direction in these matters.
TTL
@prefix case163: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/163#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case163:Engineer_A_Detailed_Review_Sufficiency_Standard_Violation a proeth:DetailedReviewSufficiencyStandardforSupervisorySealingObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Detailed Review Sufficiency Standard Violation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case163:Engineer_A_Chief_Engineer_Minimum_Engagement_Responsible_Charge_Sealing ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case163:Engineer_A_Organizational_Scale_Non-Excuse_Responsible_Charge_Sealing,
case163:Engineer_A_Organizational_Scale_Non-Excuse_Violation ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's self-described supervisory practice of establishing concepts, setting design requirements, reviewing design elements as the project progresses, and answering technical questions does not constitute the detailed review required before sealing." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case163:Detailed_Review_Sufficiency_Standard_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Sealing_Practice ;
proeth:discoveredincase "163" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T14:19:56.596848+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "163" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T14:19:56.596848+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Detailed Review Sufficiency Standard for Supervisory Sealing Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to conduct a detailed, substantive review and check of plans prepared by subordinate registered and non-registered engineers as a prerequisite to sealing those plans, recognizing that general direction and supervision alone — without detailed review — is insufficient to satisfy the responsible charge requirement." ;
proeth:sourcetext "By general direction and supervision, Engineer A means that he is involved in helping to establish the concept, the design requirements, and review elements of the design or project status as the design progresses." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Prior to each act of affixing his professional seal to subordinate-prepared plans" ;
proeth:textreferences "By general direction and supervision, Engineer A means that he is involved in helping to establish the concept, the design requirements, and review elements of the design or project status as the design progresses.",
"Engineer A finds it impossible to give a detailed review or check of the design.",
"Engineer A is consulted about technical questions and he provides answers and direction in these matters." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 163 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:34:52.831950"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 163 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
163
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T14:19:56.596848+00:00
First case
163
Generated
2026-03-01T14:19:56.596848+00:00
Attributed to
Case 163 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:34:52.831950
Generated by
ProEthica Case 163 Extraction