Engineer A Chief Engineer Minimum Engagement Responsible Charge Sealing
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/163#Engineer_A_Chief_Engineer_Minimum_Engagement_Responsible_Charge_Sealing
Properties
Instance of
ChiefEngineerManagerialRoleResponsibleChargeMinimumEngagementObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ChiefEngineerManagerialRoleResponsibleChargeMinimumEngagementObligation
Case context
Engineer A described his role as 'general direction and supervision' limited to establishing concepts, setting design requirements, reviewing elements of design, and answering technical questions — but did not conduct detailed reviews of the plans he sealed.
Compliance status
partial
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (Chief Engineer)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated, as chief engineer, to be involved at the outset of each project in establishing design concepts and requirements, to review design elements as projects developed, and to be available for technical consultation — as minimum conditions for exercising responsible charge and sealing project documents.
Temporal scope
Throughout the lifecycle of each project whose documents Engineer A sealed
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer A Case 85-3 Analogy Oversight Role Competence Prerequisite, Engineer A Detailed Review Sufficiency Standard Violation, Engineer A Responsible Charge Direct Control Non-Registered Subordinate Sealing, Engineer A Responsible Charge Direction Control Definition Application, Engineer A Seal Affixation Professional Judgment Certification Failure, Engineer A Subordinate Competence Confidence Non-Substitution Sealing Review, Engineer A Subordinate Competence Confidence Non-Substitution Violation, Engineer A Technical Segment Sealing Without Qualified Preparer Attribution
Source Evidence
Source text
the chief engineer should be involved at the outset of the project in the establishment of the design concept and the design requirements, as well as in the review of the various elements of the design or project status as the project develops
Text references
the chief engineer should be available to consult on technical questions relating to the project design
the chief engineer should be involved at the outset of the project in the establishment of the design concept and the design requirements, as well as in the review of the various elements of the design or project status as the project develops
TTL
@prefix case163: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/163#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case163:Engineer_A_Chief_Engineer_Minimum_Engagement_Responsible_Charge_Sealing a proeth:ChiefEngineerManagerialRoleResponsibleChargeMinimumEngagementObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Chief Engineer Minimum Engagement Responsible Charge Sealing" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case163:Engineer_A_Case_85-3_Analogy_Oversight_Role_Competence_Prerequisite,
case163:Engineer_A_Detailed_Review_Sufficiency_Standard_Violation,
case163:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Direct_Control_Non-Registered_Subordinate_Sealing,
case163:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Direction_Control_Definition_Application,
case163:Engineer_A_Seal_Affixation_Professional_Judgment_Certification_Failure,
case163:Engineer_A_Subordinate_Competence_Confidence_Non-Substitution_Sealing_Review,
case163:Engineer_A_Subordinate_Competence_Confidence_Non-Substitution_Violation,
case163:Engineer_A_Technical_Segment_Sealing_Without_Qualified_Preparer_Attribution ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case163:Engineer_A_General_Supervision_Without_Detailed_Design_Review,
case163:Engineer_A_Insufficient_Responsible_Charge ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A described his role as 'general direction and supervision' limited to establishing concepts, setting design requirements, reviewing elements of design, and answering technical questions — but did not conduct detailed reviews of the plans he sealed." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "partial" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case163:Chief_Engineer_Managerial_Responsible_Charge_Standard_Applied_to_Engineer_A,
case163:Responsible_Charge_Engagement_Standard_Applied_to_Engineer_A_General_Supervision ;
proeth:discoveredincase "163" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T14:26:11.018989+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "163" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T14:26:11.018989+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Chief Engineer)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Chief Engineer Managerial Role Responsible Charge Minimum Engagement Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated, as chief engineer, to be involved at the outset of each project in establishing design concepts and requirements, to review design elements as projects developed, and to be available for technical consultation — as minimum conditions for exercising responsible charge and sealing project documents." ;
proeth:sourcetext "the chief engineer should be involved at the outset of the project in the establishment of the design concept and the design requirements, as well as in the review of the various elements of the design or project status as the project develops" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the lifecycle of each project whose documents Engineer A sealed" ;
proeth:textreferences "the chief engineer should be available to consult on technical questions relating to the project design",
"the chief engineer should be involved at the outset of the project in the establishment of the design concept and the design requirements, as well as in the review of the various elements of the design or project status as the project develops" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 163 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:34:52.837569"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 163 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
163
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T14:26:11.018989+00:00
First case
163
Generated
2026-03-01T14:26:11.018989+00:00
Attributed to
Case 163 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:34:52.837569
Generated by
ProEthica Case 163 Extraction