Other Six Competing Engineering Firms
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Other_Six_Competing_Engineering_Firms
Definition
Six other engineering firms (besides Firm A) submitted qualifications and were shortlisted among the seven most qualified firms, participating in the same QBS process and offered the opportunity to likewise amend their qualification statements if desired.
Properties
Instance of
Attributes
| procurement_stage | Shortlisted among seven qualified firms |
| amendment_opportunity | Offered equal right to amend qualification statements per Firm A's request |
Confidence
0.85
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | competes_with |
| target | Firm A QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm |
| type | evaluated_by |
| target | Utility Authority QBS Procurement Administrator |
Role category
provider_client
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
The utility authority narrowed a large number of qualification submissions to seven qualified firms
Text references
The utility authority narrowed a large number of qualification submissions to seven qualified firms
with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Other_Six_Competing_Engineering_Firms a proeth:PublicRFQSubmittingEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Other Six Competing Engineering Firms" ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case162:Competing_Engineering_Firms_Equal_Amendment_Opportunity_Acceptance_and_Response ;
proeth:attributes "{'procurement_stage': 'Shortlisted among seven qualified firms', 'amendment_opportunity': \"Offered equal right to amend qualification statements per Firm A's request\"}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Six other engineering firms (besides Firm A) submitted qualifications and were shortlisted among the seven most qualified firms, participating in the same QBS process and offered the opportunity to likewise amend their qualification statements if desired." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'competes_with', 'target': 'Firm A QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm'}",
"{'type': 'evaluated_by', 'target': 'Utility Authority QBS Procurement Administrator'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Public RFQ Submitting Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The utility authority narrowed a large number of qualification submissions to seven qualified firms" ;
proeth:textreferences "The utility authority narrowed a large number of qualification submissions to seven qualified firms",
"with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.173640"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.173640
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction