Competing Engineering Firms Equal Amendment Opportunity Acceptance and Response
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Competing_Engineering_Firms_Equal_Amendment_Opportunity_Acceptance_and_Response
Properties
Instance of
CompetitiveProcurementFairnessObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetitiveProcurementFairnessObligation
Case context
The six other shortlisted firms were given the same opportunity as Firm A to revise their qualification submissions. Their equal treatment preserved the free and open competitive character of the QBS process.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.78
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Other Six Competing Engineering Firms (Equal Amendment Opportunity Recipients)
Obligation statement
The other six competing engineering firms were obligated to recognize that the equal amendment opportunity extended to them by the utility authority preserved the competitive fairness of the QBS process, and to respond to that opportunity in a manner consistent with honest and accurate representation of their qualifications.
Temporal scope
Upon receiving notice from the utility authority of the equal amendment opportunity
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team, with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired.
Text references
Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team, with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired.
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Competing_Engineering_Firms_Equal_Amendment_Opportunity_Acceptance_and_Response a proeth:CompetitiveProcurementFairnessObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Competing Engineering Firms Equal Amendment Opportunity Acceptance and Response" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case162:Firm_A_Mid-Process_Qualification_Modification_After_Screening_Feedback ;
proeth:casecontext "The six other shortlisted firms were given the same opportunity as Firm A to revise their qualification submissions. Their equal treatment preserved the free and open competitive character of the QBS process." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.78" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case162:Equal_Opportunity_Condition_as_Fairness_Threshold_Invoked_in_QBS_Amendment_Analysis,
case162:Fairness_in_Professional_Competition_Invoked_in_QBS_Amendment_Objection_Analysis ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Other Six Competing Engineering Firms (Equal Amendment Opportunity Recipients)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Competitive Procurement Fairness Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The other six competing engineering firms were obligated to recognize that the equal amendment opportunity extended to them by the utility authority preserved the competitive fairness of the QBS process, and to respond to that opportunity in a manner consistent with honest and accurate representation of their qualifications." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team, with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon receiving notice from the utility authority of the equal amendment opportunity" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team, with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.179384"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.179384
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction