Firm A Post-Feedback QBS Qualification Amendment Honest Disclosure to Utility Authority
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Firm_A_Post-Feedback_QBS_Qualification_Amendment_Honest_Disclosure_to_Utility_Authority
Properties
Instance of
Post-FeedbackQBSQualificationAmendmentHonestDisclosuretoProcuringAuthorityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-FeedbackQBSQualificationAmendmentHonestDisclosuretoProcuringAuthorityObligation
Case context
Firm A openly informed the utility authority of its team restructuring and formally requested permission to amend its qualification submission, conditioning that request on all competing firms receiving the same opportunity. The Board found this open disclosure consistent with ethical requirements.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Firm A (QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm)
Obligation statement
Firm A was obligated, upon restructuring its joint venture team in response to screening committee feedback, to openly and honestly disclose that restructuring to the utility authority and formally request authorization for the amendment through proper channels, rather than submitting an amended qualification statement without explanation.
Temporal scope
Upon deciding to restructure the joint venture team and before submitting the amended qualification statement
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A openly informed the utility authority of its team restructuring and formally requested permission to amend its qualification submission
Text references
Firm A openly informed the utility authority of its team restructuring and formally requested permission to amend its qualification submission
Pre-Selection Process Openness and Responsiveness Permissibility Principle -- Rather than concealing its team restructuring or presenting an amended submission without disclosure, Firm A openly informed the utility authority
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Firm_A_Post-Feedback_QBS_Qualification_Amendment_Honest_Disclosure_to_Utility_Authority a proeth:Post-FeedbackQBSQualificationAmendmentHonestDisclosuretoProcuringAuthorityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Firm A Post-Feedback QBS Qualification Amendment Honest Disclosure to Utility Authority" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case162:Utility_Authority_QBS_Procurement_Law_Conformance_in_Administering_Selection_Process ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case162:Firm_A_Mid-Process_Qualification_Modification_After_Screening_Feedback ;
proeth:casecontext "Firm A openly informed the utility authority of its team restructuring and formally requested permission to amend its qualification submission, conditioning that request on all competing firms receiving the same opportunity. The Board found this open disclosure consistent with ethical requirements." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case162:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Invoked_by_Firm_A_Qualification_Accuracy,
case162:Pre-Selection_Process_Openness_Invoked_by_Firm_A_Disclosure_to_Authority ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:49:20.970426+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:49:20.970426+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Firm A (QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Feedback QBS Qualification Amendment Honest Disclosure to Procuring Authority Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Firm A was obligated, upon restructuring its joint venture team in response to screening committee feedback, to openly and honestly disclose that restructuring to the utility authority and formally request authorization for the amendment through proper channels, rather than submitting an amended qualification statement without explanation." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm A openly informed the utility authority of its team restructuring and formally requested permission to amend its qualification submission" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon deciding to restructure the joint venture team and before submitting the amended qualification statement" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firm A openly informed the utility authority of its team restructuring and formally requested permission to amend its qualification submission",
"Pre-Selection Process Openness and Responsiveness Permissibility Principle -- Rather than concealing its team restructuring or presenting an amended submission without disclosure, Firm A openly informed the utility authority" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.186745"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:49:20.970426+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:49:20.970426+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.186745
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction