Firm A Mid-Process Qualification Modification After Screening Feedback
Individual
c26222dd
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Firm_A_Mid-Process_Qualification_Modification_After_Screening_Feedback
Properties
Parent
Mid-ProcessQualificationProposalModificationAfterEvaluatorFeedbackState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Mid-ProcessQualificationProposalModificationAfterEvaluatorFeedbackState
Activeperiod
From Firm A's receipt of screening committee feedback at public meeting through authority's grant of revision permission and submission of revised proposal
Affectedparties
City council members
Firm A
General public
Other six shortlisted firms
Public utility authority screening committee
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Stateclass
Mid-Process Qualification Proposal Modification After Evaluator Feedback State
Subject
Firm A's restructuring of its joint venture team and request to revise qualification statement during active QBS procurement
Terminatedby
Submission of revised qualification proposal by Firm A; subsequent public and council objection
Triggeringevent
Screening committee's communication that Firm A's joint venture lacked sufficient experience in certain technical aspects and desirable backup of specialized technical personnel
Urgencylevel
medium
Source Evidence
Source Text
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability
Text References
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability
Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team
a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it
with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Firm_A_Mid-Process_Qualification_Modification_After_Screening_Feedback> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Firm A Mid-Process Qualification Modification After Screening Feedback" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Mid-ProcessQualificationProposalModificationAfterEvaluatorFeedbackState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
c26222dd3388a57c...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
162
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
First Case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
Attributed To
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.172601
Generated By
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction