Firm A Mid-Process Qualification Modification After Screening Feedback
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Firm_A_Mid-Process_Qualification_Modification_After_Screening_Feedback
Properties
Instance of
Mid-ProcessQualificationProposalModificationAfterEvaluatorFeedbackState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Mid-ProcessQualificationProposalModificationAfterEvaluatorFeedbackState
Active period
From Firm A's receipt of screening committee feedback at public meeting through authority's grant of revision permission and submission of revised proposal
Affected parties
City council members
Firm A
General public
Other six shortlisted firms
Public utility authority screening committee
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Firm A's restructuring of its joint venture team and request to revise qualification statement during active QBS procurement
Terminated by
Submission of revised qualification proposal by Firm A; subsequent public and council objection
Triggering event
Screening committee's communication that Firm A's joint venture lacked sufficient experience in certain technical aspects and desirable backup of specialized technical personnel
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability
Text references
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability
Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team
a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it
with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Firm_A_Mid-Process_Qualification_Modification_After_Screening_Feedback a proeth:Mid-ProcessQualificationProposalModificationAfterEvaluatorFeedbackState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Firm A Mid-Process Qualification Modification After Screening Feedback" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Firm A's receipt of screening committee feedback at public meeting through authority's grant of revision permission and submission of revised proposal" ;
proeth:affectedparties "City council members",
"Firm A",
"General public",
"Other six shortlisted firms",
"Public utility authority screening committee" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability" ;
proeth:stateclass "Mid-Process Qualification Proposal Modification After Evaluator Feedback State" ;
proeth:subject "Firm A's restructuring of its joint venture team and request to revise qualification statement during active QBS procurement" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Submission of revised qualification proposal by Firm A; subsequent public and council objection" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability",
"Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team",
"a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it",
"with the understanding that all competing firms be allowed to likewise modify their statements of qualification, if desired" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Screening committee's communication that Firm A's joint venture lacked sufficient experience in certain technical aspects and desirable backup of specialized technical personnel" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.172601"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.172601
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction