Engineer A Cooperative Practice Alternative Identification Instance

@prefix case16: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/16#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case16:Engineer_A_Cooperative_Practice_Alternative_Identification_Instance a proeth:CooperativePracticeAlternativeIdentificationObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Cooperative Practice Alternative Identification Instance" ; proeth-core:competesWith case16:Engineer_A_Impaired_Practice_State_Board_Reporting_Obligation_Instance ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case16:Engineer_A_Cooperative_Disclosure_Pathway_Available ; proeth:casecontext "The NSPE BER noted that Engineer A's friendship with Engineer B, while not justifying non-reporting, warranted consideration in how the reporting was carried out — specifically, that Engineer A could have worked with Engineer B to identify a compliant practice alternative and presented that to the Board, potentially influencing the Board's exercise of discretion regarding formal sanction." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.85" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case16:Compassionate_Peer_Reporting_Obligation_Invoked_For_Engineer_A ; proeth:discoveredincase "16" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T12:02:21.309464+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "16" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T12:02:21.309464+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Cooperative Practice Alternative Identification Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A, as Engineer B's personal friend and with Engineer B's knowledge and approval, was permitted — and encouraged — to cooperatively identify a temporary practice management alternative (such as engaging Engineer R as a temporary licensed engineer) when reporting Engineer B to the State Board, so that the reporting obligation was fulfilled without unnecessarily destroying Engineer B's practice." ; proeth:sourcetext "As Engineer B's friend and with Engineer B's approval, once the matter was reported to the Board, it would have been permissible for Engineer A to help cooperatively identify a temporary practice management alternative that supported the professional and ethical practice of engineering work in Engineer B's business, until Engineer B returned to full duty." ; proeth:temporalscope "Contemporaneous with or immediately following the required report to the State Board" ; proeth:textreferences "As Engineer B's friend and with Engineer B's approval, once the matter was reported to the Board, it would have been permissible for Engineer A to help cooperatively identify a temporary practice management alternative that supported the professional and ethical practice of engineering work in Engineer B's business, until Engineer B returned to full duty.", "Working together, the parties might cooperatively identify a practice alternative consistent with ethical and legal engineering consulting work, say, hiring a qualified temporary engineer – possibly Engineer R – until Engineer B was able to return to full duty." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 16 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T12:12:21.728362"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 16 Extraction" .