Compassionate Peer Reporting Obligation Invoked For Engineer A
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/16#Compassionate_Peer_Reporting_Obligation_Invoked_For_Engineer_A
Properties
Instance of
CompassionatePeerReportingObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompassionatePeerReportingObligation
Applied to
Engineer A's decision regarding reporting Engineer B to State Board
Balancing with
Personal friendship loyalty
Public Welfare Paramount
Concrete expression
Engineer A, as Engineer B's personal friend, had both the obligation to report Engineer B's impaired practice to the State Board and the legitimate option to do so in a compassionate, cooperative manner that respected their friendship — but the friendship did not exempt Engineer A from the reporting obligation itself
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Interpretation
The friendship created space for compassionate engagement (private confrontation, cooperative reporting, advocacy for alternative solutions) but did not create an exemption from the mandatory reporting obligation
Invoked by
Engineer A Compassionate Peer Reporting Engineer
Tension resolution
Reporting obligation is mandatory; friendship affects the manner of fulfillment (cooperative, compassionate approach with State Board) but not the existence of the obligation
Source Evidence
Source text
Because of their long friendship and consideration of Engineer B's impairment, Engineer A did not report Engineer B to the State Board.
Text references
As a professional courtesy, and because he considered Engineer B a personal friend, Engineer A met privately with Engineer B and confronted him with the faulty design
Engineer A could have privately discussed the matter with proper authorities at the State Board. Working together, the parties might cooperatively identify a practice alternative
any of them must begin with the conviction that the ethics code does not permit engineers to turn a blind eye to the unethical practice of engineering
TTL
@prefix case16: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/16#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case16:Compassionate_Peer_Reporting_Obligation_Invoked_For_Engineer_A a proeth:CompassionatePeerReportingObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Compassionate Peer Reporting Obligation Invoked For Engineer A" ;
proeth:appliedto "Engineer A's decision regarding reporting Engineer B to State Board" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Personal friendship loyalty",
"Public Welfare Paramount" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A, as Engineer B's personal friend, had both the obligation to report Engineer B's impaired practice to the State Board and the legitimate option to do so in a compassionate, cooperative manner that respected their friendship — but the friendship did not exempt Engineer A from the reporting obligation itself" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "16" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T11:58:37.875161+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "16" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T11:58:37.875161+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The friendship created space for compassionate engagement (private confrontation, cooperative reporting, advocacy for alternative solutions) but did not create an exemption from the mandatory reporting obligation" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Compassionate Peer Reporting Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Compassionate Peer Reporting Obligation" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Because of their long friendship and consideration of Engineer B's impairment, Engineer A did not report Engineer B to the State Board." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Reporting obligation is mandatory; friendship affects the manner of fulfillment (cooperative, compassionate approach with State Board) but not the existence of the obligation" ;
proeth:textreferences "As a professional courtesy, and because he considered Engineer B a personal friend, Engineer A met privately with Engineer B and confronted him with the faulty design",
"Engineer A could have privately discussed the matter with proper authorities at the State Board. Working together, the parties might cooperatively identify a practice alternative",
"any of them must begin with the conviction that the ethics code does not permit engineers to turn a blind eye to the unethical practice of engineering" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 16 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T12:12:21.727204"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 16 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
16
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T11:58:37.875161+00:00
First case
16
Generated
2026-02-25T11:58:37.875161+00:00
Attributed to
Case 16 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T12:12:21.727204
Generated by
ProEthica Case 16 Extraction