Faithful Agent Obligation Engineer A Subcontractor Review Role
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Engineer_A_Subcontractor_Review_Role
Properties
Instance of
Case context
Engineer A's assigned duties related to review of the adequacy and acceptability of subcontractor plans and materials. He fulfilled this role by identifying deficiencies and formally reporting them to management through memoranda.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to act as a faithful agent of his employer by diligently reviewing subcontractor submissions for adequacy and specification compliance within his assigned role, and by formally advising management of identified deficiencies — fulfilling the faithful agent duty through honest, complete, and documented reporting of professional findings.
Temporal scope
Throughout the duration of his assigned subcontractor review duties
Relationships
competesWith
Defense Pressure Resistance Engineer A Probation Thre at, Defense Subcontract or Specification Compliance Reporting Engineer A Management Memoranda, Non-Safety Public Funds Whistleblowing Personal Conscience Right Engineer A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A's assigned duties relate to the work of subcontractors, including review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors.
Text references
Engineer A advised his superiors by memoranda of problems he found with certain submissions of one of the subcontractors, and urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined.
Engineer A's assigned duties relate to the work of subcontractors, including review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors.
TTL
@prefix case157: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case157:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Engineer_A_Subcontractor_Review_Role a proeth:FaithfulAgentObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Faithful Agent Obligation Engineer A Subcontractor Review Role" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case157:Defense_Pressure_Resistance_Engineer_A_Probation_Threat,
case157:Defense_Subcontractor_Specification_Compliance_Reporting_Engineer_A_Management_Memoranda,
case157:Non-Safety_Public_Funds_Whistleblowing_Personal_Conscience_Right_Engineer_A ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#Faithful_Agent_Boundary_—_Engineer_A_Post-Management-Override>,
case157:Management_Override_of_Engineer_As_Subcontractor_Rejection_Recommendation ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's assigned duties related to review of the adequacy and acceptability of subcontractor plans and materials. He fulfilled this role by identifying deficiencies and formally reporting them to management through memoranda." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case157:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Bounded_by_Ethics_in_Defense_Contractor_Role,
case157:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_In_Subcontractor_Review_Role ;
proeth:discoveredincase "157" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T19:26:09.376217+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "157" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T19:26:09.376217+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Faithful Agent Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to act as a faithful agent of his employer by diligently reviewing subcontractor submissions for adequacy and specification compliance within his assigned role, and by formally advising management of identified deficiencies — fulfilling the faithful agent duty through honest, complete, and documented reporting of professional findings." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A's assigned duties relate to the work of subcontractors, including review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the duration of his assigned subcontractor review duties" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A advised his superiors by memoranda of problems he found with certain submissions of one of the subcontractors, and urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined.",
"Engineer A's assigned duties relate to the work of subcontractors, including review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 157 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T19:40:53.887313"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 157 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
157
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T19:26:09.376217+00:00
First case
157
Generated
2026-03-01T19:26:09.376217+00:00
Attributed to
Case 157 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T19:40:53.887313
Generated by
ProEthica Case 157 Extraction