Faithful Agent Obligation Invoked By Engineer A In Subcontractor Review Role
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_In_Subcontractor_Review_Role
Properties
Instance of
FaithfulAgentObligationWithinEthicalLimits
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#FaithfulAgentObligationWithinEthicalLimits
Applied to
Engineer A's assigned subcontractor review duties
Engineer A's memoranda to management regarding deficiencies
Balancing with
Engineer Pressure Resistance and Ethical Non-Subordination to Organizational Demands
Public Welfare Paramount
Concrete expression
Engineer A fulfilled his assigned role as faithful agent by diligently reviewing subcontractor submissions and advising management of deficiencies through memoranda — but retained his professional authority to flag concerns that conflicted with specification compliance obligations, even when management disagreed
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Interpretation
Engineer A properly discharged his faithful agent obligation by performing his assigned review duties and communicating concerns through proper channels; the faithful agent role does not require him to suppress professional concerns at management direction
Invoked by
Engineer A Defense Industry Whistleblower Engineer
Tension resolution
The faithful agent obligation is fulfilled through diligent performance and honest communication; it does not require acquiescence to management suppression of legitimate professional concerns
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A advised his superiors by memoranda of problems he found with certain submissions of one of the subcontractors, and urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined.
Text references
Engineer A advised his superiors by memoranda of problems he found with certain submissions of one of the subcontractors, and urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined.
Engineer A's assigned duties relate to the work of subcontractors, including review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors.
TTL
@prefix case157: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case157:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_In_Subcontractor_Review_Role a proeth:FaithfulAgentObligationWithinEthicalLimits,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Faithful Agent Obligation Invoked By Engineer A In Subcontractor Review Role" ;
proeth:appliedto "Engineer A's assigned subcontractor review duties",
"Engineer A's memoranda to management regarding deficiencies" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Engineer Pressure Resistance and Ethical Non-Subordination to Organizational Demands",
"Public Welfare Paramount" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A fulfilled his assigned role as faithful agent by diligently reviewing subcontractor submissions and advising management of deficiencies through memoranda — but retained his professional authority to flag concerns that conflicted with specification compliance obligations, even when management disagreed" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "157" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T19:23:26.794173+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "157" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T19:23:26.794173+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Engineer A properly discharged his faithful agent obligation by performing his assigned review duties and communicating concerns through proper channels; the faithful agent role does not require him to suppress professional concerns at management direction" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Defense Industry Whistleblower Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A advised his superiors by memoranda of problems he found with certain submissions of one of the subcontractors, and urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The faithful agent obligation is fulfilled through diligent performance and honest communication; it does not require acquiescence to management suppression of legitimate professional concerns" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A advised his superiors by memoranda of problems he found with certain submissions of one of the subcontractors, and urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined.",
"Engineer A's assigned duties relate to the work of subcontractors, including review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 157 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T19:40:53.885313"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 157 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
157
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T19:23:26.794173+00:00
First case
157
Generated
2026-03-01T19:23:26.794173+00:00
Attributed to
Case 157 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T19:40:53.885313
Generated by
ProEthica Case 157 Extraction