Engineer B Peer Review Notification
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Notification
Definition
Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans, regardless of the Owner's instruction to proceed covertly.
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewNotificationObligation
Case context
Owner retained Engineer B to conduct a peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans after significant errors were found in the first tower. Owner instructed Engineer B to proceed without notifying Engineer A.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.92
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans, regardless of the Owner's instruction to proceed covertly.
Temporal scope
Prior to commencement of the peer review
Match Confidence
0.78
Match Reasoning
Via class 'Peer Review Notification Obligation': This is a specialization of the existing Collegial Obligation class, adding the specific context of peer review notification. The existing class covers duties toward professional peers including respect and fairness, which encompasses the duty to notify a peer before reviewing their work. Confidence is medium because the existing class is more general.
Matched Ontology Label
Collegial Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer B
prevailsOver
Engineer B Confidentiality Review Scope Obligation
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer B Transparency Notification
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A.
When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A, Engineer A objects and refused to consent to the peer review.
Source text
Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A.
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Notification a proeth:PeerReviewNotificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Peer Review Notification" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case15:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case15:Engineer_B_Confidentiality_Review_Scope_Obligation ;
proeth:caseContext "Owner retained Engineer B to conduct a peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans after significant errors were found in the first tower. Owner instructed Engineer B to proceed without notifying Engineer A." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case15:Engineer_B_Transparency_Notification ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Peer Review Notification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans, regardless of the Owner's instruction to proceed covertly." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Prior to commencement of the peer review" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A.",
"When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A, Engineer A objects and refused to consent to the peer review." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.78 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Peer Review Notification Obligation': This is a specialization of the existing Collegial Obligation class, adding the specific context of peer review notification. The existing class covers duties toward professional peers including respect and fairness, which encompasses the duty to notify a peer before reviewing their work. Confidence is medium because the existing class is more general." ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:CollegialObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Collegial Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans, regardless of the Owner's instruction to proceed covertly." ;
skos:definition "Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the peer review of Engineer A's second tower plans, regardless of the Owner's instruction to proceed covertly." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction