Engineer B Transparency Notification
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_B_Transparency_Notification
Definition
Engineer B insisted on notifying Engineer A before commencing the peer review, refusing to conduct a covert review despite the Owner's instruction to proceed without notification.
Properties
Instance of
Applied to
Notification obligation to Engineer A
Peer review engagement with Owner
Balancing with
Confidentiality of Professional Review
Loyalty
Concrete expression
Engineer B insisted on notifying Engineer A before commencing the peer review, refusing to conduct a covert review despite the Owner's instruction to proceed without notification.
Confidence
0.91
Interpretation
Transparency in peer review requires that the engineer whose work is being reviewed be informed of the review at the outset, so that the process is conducted openly rather than as a covert evaluation.
Tension resolution
Transparency toward Engineer A was treated as a precondition of accepting the engagement, not as a matter to be traded off against client preference for confidentiality.
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Transparency'
Matched Ontology Label
Transparency
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
appliedTo
balancingWith
concreteExpression
confidence
interpretation
principleClass
tensionResolution
textReferences
Relationships
invokedBy
Agent Engineer B
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A
Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know
When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A
Source text
Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A. When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A.
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Engineer_B_Transparency_Notification a proeth:Transparency,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Transparency Notification" ;
proeth-core:invokedBy case15:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:appliedTo "Notification obligation to Engineer A",
"Peer review engagement with Owner" ;
proeth:balancingWith "Confidentiality of Professional Review",
"Loyalty" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteExpression "Engineer B insisted on notifying Engineer A before commencing the peer review, refusing to conduct a covert review despite the Owner's instruction to proceed without notification." ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:interpretation "Transparency in peer review requires that the engineer whose work is being reviewed be informed of the review at the outset, so that the process is conducted openly rather than as a covert evaluation." ;
proeth:invokedBy "Engineer B Peer Review Engineer",
"Engineer B Peer Reviewer" ;
proeth:principleClass "Transparency" ;
proeth:tensionResolution "Transparency toward Engineer A was treated as a precondition of accepting the engagement, not as a matter to be traded off against client preference for confidentiality." ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A",
"Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know",
"When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:55:30.891672+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Transparency'" ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass <http://proethica.org/ontology/principles#Transparency> ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Transparency" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A. When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "appliedTo",
"balancingWith",
"concreteExpression",
"confidence",
"interpretation",
"principleClass",
"tensionResolution",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer B insisted on notifying Engineer A before commencing the peer review, refusing to conduct a covert review despite the Owner's instruction to proceed without notification." ;
skos:definition "Engineer B insisted on notifying Engineer A before commencing the peer review, refusing to conduct a covert review despite the Owner's instruction to proceed without notification." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:55:30.891672+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:55:30.891672+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:55:30.891672+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction