Engineer A Pending Competence Complaint Non-Disclosure to Client B

@prefix case147: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case147:Engineer_A_Pending_Competence_Complaint_Non-Disclosure_to_Client_B a proeth:PendingCompetenceComplaintDisclosureObligationtoCurrentClient, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Pending Competence Complaint Non-Disclosure to Client B" ; proeth-core:competesWith case147:Engineer_A_Allegation-Adjudication_Distinction_Invocation_in_Non-Disclosure_Decision ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case147:Client_B_Trust_Undermined_by_Non-Disclosure_Discovery, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#Client_C_Competence_Allegation_—_Similar_Services_Context>, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#Privacy_Right_vs._Material_Omission_—_Competence_Allegation> ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer A was retained by Client B for design and CPM scheduling services on a manufacturing facility. While performing those services, Engineer A was contacted by the state board regarding a complaint by Client C alleging incompetence in similar services. Engineer A chose not to disclose this to Client B. Client B later learned through a third party and expressed that Engineer A should have disclosed." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case147:Pending_Competence_Complaint_Disclosure_Obligation_Negated_by_Allegation_Status ; proeth:discoveredincase "147" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T07:39:30.231972+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "147" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T07:39:30.231972+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Pending Competence Complaint Disclosure Obligation to Current Client" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to weigh whether to disclose to Client B the existence of the pending ethics complaint filed by Client C alleging incompetence in services materially similar to those being performed for Client B, and given the similarity of services and the faithful agent relationship, prudential disclosure to Client B was warranted even though the complaint was an unproven allegation." ; proeth:sourcetext "During the rendering of services to Client B on this project, the state board of professional engineers contacts Engineer A regarding an ethics complaint filed against Engineer A by Client C relating to services provided on a project for Client C that are similar to the services being performed for Client B." ; proeth:temporalscope "Upon receipt of notification from the state board of professional engineers regarding the pending ethics complaint, and throughout the duration of the engagement with Client B" ; proeth:textreferences "Client B learns of the ethics complaint filed against Engineer A and tells Engineer A that he is upset by the allegations and that Engineer A should have brought the matter to Client B's attention.", "Client C alleges that Engineer A lacked the competence to perform the services in question.", "During the rendering of services to Client B on this project, the state board of professional engineers contacts Engineer A regarding an ethics complaint filed against Engineer A by Client C relating to services provided on a project for Client C that are similar to the services being performed for Client B.", "Engineer A does not believe it is necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 147 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:56:55.828623"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 147 Extraction" .