Privacy Right vs. Material Omission — Competence Allegation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#Privacy_Right_vs._Material_Omission_—_Competence_Allegation
Properties
Instance of
PrivacyRightvs.MaterialOmissionTensionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PrivacyRightvs.MaterialOmissionTensionState
Active period
From Engineer A's receipt of the board's contact through Client B's discovery
Affected parties
Client B
Engineer A
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's tension between the right not to disclose an unproven allegation and the duty to avoid material omissions that could affect Client B's informed decision-making
Terminated by
Client B's independent discovery of the complaint
Triggering event
Engineer A's conscious decision not to disclose the pending complaint to Client B
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A does not believe it is necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint
Text references
Client B learns of the ethics complaint filed against Engineer A and tells Engineer A that he is upset by the allegations and that Engineer A should have brought the matter to Client B's attention
Engineer A does not believe it is necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#Privacy_Right_vs._Material_Omission_—_Competence_Allegation> a proeth:PrivacyRightvs.MaterialOmissionTensionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Privacy Right vs. Material Omission — Competence Allegation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's receipt of the board's contact through Client B's discovery" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client B",
"Engineer A" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "147" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T07:34:06.224076+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "147" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T07:34:06.224076+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A does not believe it is necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint" ;
proeth:stateclass "Privacy Right vs. Material Omission Tension State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's tension between the right not to disclose an unproven allegation and the duty to avoid material omissions that could affect Client B's informed decision-making" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client B's independent discovery of the complaint" ;
proeth:textreferences "Client B learns of the ethics complaint filed against Engineer A and tells Engineer A that he is upset by the allegations and that Engineer A should have brought the matter to Client B's attention",
"Engineer A does not believe it is necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's conscious decision not to disclose the pending complaint to Client B" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 147 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:56:55.824900"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 147 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
147
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T07:34:06.224076+00:00
First case
147
Generated
2026-03-01T07:34:06.224076+00:00
Attributed to
Case 147 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T07:56:55.824900
Generated by
ProEthica Case 147 Extraction