Engineer A Current Case Post-Unresponsive-County-Official Multi-Agency Escalation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#Engineer_A_Current_Case_Post-Unresponsive-County-Official_Multi-Agency_Escalation
Properties
Instance of
Post-Unresponsive-OfficialSupervisorandMulti-AgencyEscalationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-Unresponsive-OfficialSupervisorandMulti-AgencyEscalationObligation
Case context
Engineer A retained for fire origin/cause investigation observed structural instability, notified Client B and called the county building official who did not return the call; Engineer A did not escalate further.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (current case)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated, after the county building official failed to return the phone call, to escalate the structural safety concern to the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, and any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted following the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
Temporal scope
Upon failure of the county building official to return Engineer A's phone call
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Proportional Escalation Obligation Applied to Current Case
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
Text references
Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
TTL
@prefix case132: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case132:Engineer_A_Current_Case_Post-Unresponsive-County-Official_Multi-Agency_Escalation a proeth:Post-Unresponsive-OfficialSupervisorandMulti-AgencyEscalationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Current Case Post-Unresponsive-County-Official Multi-Agency Escalation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case132:Engineer_A_Non-Imminent_Collapse_Proportionate_Response_Calibration ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case132:Engineer_A_Current_Case_Corrective_Action_Pursuit_Scope_Calibration ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A retained for fire origin/cause investigation observed structural instability, notified Client B and called the county building official who did not return the call; Engineer A did not escalate further." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case132:Proportional_Escalation_Obligation_Applied_to_Current_Case ;
proeth:discoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (current case)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Unresponsive-Official Supervisor and Multi-Agency Escalation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated, after the county building official failed to return the phone call, to escalate the structural safety concern to the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, and any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted following the issuance of the certificate of occupancy." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon failure of the county building official to return Engineer A's phone call" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 132 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T18:17:34.029458"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 132 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
132
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00
First case
132
Generated
2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00
Attributed to
Case 132 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T18:17:34.029458
Generated by
ProEthica Case 132 Extraction