Proportional Escalation Obligation Applied to Current Case
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#Proportional_Escalation_Obligation_Applied_to_Current_Case
Properties
Instance of
ProportionalEscalationObligationCalibratedtoImminenceandBreadthofRisk
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProportionalEscalationObligationCalibratedtoImminenceandBreadthofRisk
Applied to
Structurally unstable building with recent structural modifications
Balancing with
Client confidentiality
Contractual scope limitations
Concrete expression
Although Engineer A did not believe the building was in danger of imminent collapse, the non-imminent but significant structural risk required escalation beyond the unanswered county building official contact to the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or other agencies with jurisdiction
Confidence
0.96
Importance
high
Interpretation
Non-imminent but significant structural risk triggers a measured but persistent escalation obligation — not a full-bore multi-authority campaign, but more than a single unanswered phone call
Invoked by
Engineer A (Current Case) Forensic Building Investigation Engineer
Tension resolution
The measured escalation level is appropriate to the non-imminent nature of the risk while still discharging the public welfare obligation
Source Evidence
Source text
Although Engineer A did not believe the building was in danger of imminent collapse, Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter
Text references
Although Engineer A did not believe the building was in danger of imminent collapse, Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
TTL
@prefix case132: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case132:Proportional_Escalation_Obligation_Applied_to_Current_Case a proeth:ProportionalEscalationObligationCalibratedtoImminenceandBreadthofRisk,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Proportional Escalation Obligation Applied to Current Case" ;
proeth:appliedto "Structurally unstable building with recent structural modifications" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client confidentiality",
"Contractual scope limitations" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Although Engineer A did not believe the building was in danger of imminent collapse, the non-imminent but significant structural risk required escalation beyond the unanswered county building official contact to the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or other agencies with jurisdiction" ;
proeth:confidence "0.96" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Non-imminent but significant structural risk triggers a measured but persistent escalation obligation — not a full-bore multi-authority campaign, but more than a single unanswered phone call" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A (Current Case) Forensic Building Investigation Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Proportional Escalation Obligation Calibrated to Imminence and Breadth of Risk" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Although Engineer A did not believe the building was in danger of imminent collapse, Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The measured escalation level is appropriate to the non-imminent nature of the risk while still discharging the public welfare obligation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Although Engineer A did not believe the building was in danger of imminent collapse, Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 132 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T18:17:34.027798"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 132 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
132
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00
First case
132
Generated
2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00
Attributed to
Case 132 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T18:17:34.027798
Generated by
ProEthica Case 132 Extraction