XYZ Consultants Hiring Authority Licensure Due Diligence Inquiry
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#XYZ_Consultants_Hiring_Authority_Licensure_Due_Diligence_Inquiry
Properties
Instance of
EmployerLicensureConditionDueDiligenceInquiryObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EmployerLicensureConditionDueDiligenceInquiryObligation
Case context
XYZ Consultants advertised a position requiring PE licensure within 90 days, interviewed Engineer Intern A who disclosed he was not yet licensed, but did not inquire about prior exam attempts before extending an offer.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.82
Importance
medium
Obligated party
XYZ Consultants (Hiring Authority)
Obligation statement
XYZ Consultants was obligated to conduct reasonable due diligence during the hiring process by inquiring about Engineer Intern A's prior PE examination attempts, given that the advertised position explicitly required PE licensure within 90 days of hire.
Temporal scope
During the interview and hiring process
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer Intern A Employer Licensure Expectation Defeated
Source Evidence
Source text
XYZ Consultants did not ask.
Text references
The qualifications listed in the advertisement included 4 years' experience, with a PE in State X required or achieved within 90 days after date of hire.
XYZ Consultants did not ask.
XYZ Consultants offered the position to Engineer Intern A with the expectation that Engineer Intern A was on the track to obtain a PE license.
TTL
@prefix case130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case130:XYZ_Consultants_Hiring_Authority_Licensure_Due_Diligence_Inquiry a proeth:EmployerLicensureConditionDueDiligenceInquiryObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "XYZ Consultants Hiring Authority Licensure Due Diligence Inquiry" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case130:Engineer_Intern_A_Pre-Interview_PE_Exam_Attempt_Non-Disclosure ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case130:Engineer_Intern_A_Employer_Licensure_Expectation_Defeated ;
proeth:casecontext "XYZ Consultants advertised a position requiring PE licensure within 90 days, interviewed Engineer Intern A who disclosed he was not yet licensed, but did not inquire about prior exam attempts before extending an offer." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case130:Employer_Hiring_Due_Diligence_Invoked_By_XYZ_Consultants,
case130:Licensure_Integrity_Invoked_In_XYZ_Consultants_Hiring_Context ;
proeth:discoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "XYZ Consultants (Hiring Authority)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Employer Licensure Condition Due Diligence Inquiry Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "XYZ Consultants was obligated to conduct reasonable due diligence during the hiring process by inquiring about Engineer Intern A's prior PE examination attempts, given that the advertised position explicitly required PE licensure within 90 days of hire." ;
proeth:sourcetext "XYZ Consultants did not ask." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During the interview and hiring process" ;
proeth:textreferences "The qualifications listed in the advertisement included 4 years' experience, with a PE in State X required or achieved within 90 days after date of hire.",
"XYZ Consultants did not ask.",
"XYZ Consultants offered the position to Engineer Intern A with the expectation that Engineer Intern A was on the track to obtain a PE license." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 130 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T09:45:01.027754"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 130 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
130
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00
First case
130
Generated
2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00
Attributed to
Case 130 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T09:45:01.027754
Generated by
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction