Engineer Intern A Pre-Interview PE Exam Attempt Non-Disclosure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#Engineer_Intern_A_Pre-Interview_PE_Exam_Attempt_Non-Disclosure
Properties
Instance of
Pre-EmploymentPEExamAttemptHistoryDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Pre-EmploymentPEExamAttemptHistoryDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer Intern A had made multiple prior attempts to pass the PE exam before the interview with XYZ Consultants, but did not disclose this history while representing an intention to take the exam 'in the coming weeks.'
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer Intern A
Obligation statement
Engineer Intern A was obligated to disclose his prior PE examination failures to XYZ Consultants during the interview, given that the advertised position required PE licensure within 90 days and his prior failures were material to the employer's assessment of whether he could satisfy that condition.
Temporal scope
At the time of the interview with XYZ Consultants
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer Intern A PE Exam Failure Non-Disclosure Materiality Assessment, XYZ Consultants Hiring Authority Licensure Due Diligence Inquiry
defeasibleUnder
Engineer Intern A Pre-Hire PE Failure Non-Disclosure
derivedFromPrinciple
Pre-Employment Qualification Disclosure Invoked By Engineer Intern A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer Intern A did not indicate in the interview his previous attempts to pass the PE exam, and XYZ Consultants did not ask.
Text references
Engineer Intern A did not indicate in the interview his previous attempts to pass the PE exam, and XYZ Consultants did not ask.
Engineer Intern A explains he is not a licensed PE in State Y but indicates an intention to take the PE exam in the coming weeks.
XYZ Consultants offered the position to Engineer Intern A with the expectation that Engineer Intern A was on the track to obtain a PE license.
TTL
@prefix case130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case130:Engineer_Intern_A_Pre-Interview_PE_Exam_Attempt_Non-Disclosure a proeth:Pre-EmploymentPEExamAttemptHistoryDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer Intern A Pre-Interview PE Exam Attempt Non-Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case130:Engineer_Intern_A_PE_Exam_Failure_Non-Disclosure_Materiality_Assessment,
case130:XYZ_Consultants_Hiring_Authority_Licensure_Due_Diligence_Inquiry ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case130:Engineer_Intern_A_Pre-Hire_PE_Failure_Non-Disclosure ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer Intern A had made multiple prior attempts to pass the PE exam before the interview with XYZ Consultants, but did not disclose this history while representing an intention to take the exam 'in the coming weeks.'" ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case130:Pre-Employment_Qualification_Disclosure_Invoked_By_Engineer_Intern_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer Intern A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Pre-Employment PE Exam Attempt History Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer Intern A was obligated to disclose his prior PE examination failures to XYZ Consultants during the interview, given that the advertised position required PE licensure within 90 days and his prior failures were material to the employer's assessment of whether he could satisfy that condition." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer Intern A did not indicate in the interview his previous attempts to pass the PE exam, and XYZ Consultants did not ask." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of the interview with XYZ Consultants" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer Intern A did not indicate in the interview his previous attempts to pass the PE exam, and XYZ Consultants did not ask.",
"Engineer Intern A explains he is not a licensed PE in State Y but indicates an intention to take the PE exam in the coming weeks.",
"XYZ Consultants offered the position to Engineer Intern A with the expectation that Engineer Intern A was on the track to obtain a PE license." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 130 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T09:45:01.027155"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 130 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
130
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00
First case
130
Generated
2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00
Attributed to
Case 130 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T09:45:01.027155
Generated by
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction