Engineer A Volunteer Standards Role Non-Preclusion of Forensic Service

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#Engineer_A_Volunteer_Standards_Role_Non-Preclusion_of_Forensic_Service
Properties
Instance of
VolunteerStandardsRoleNon-PreclusionofForensicExpertServiceObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#VolunteerStandardsRoleNon-PreclusionofForensicExpertServiceObligation
Case context
The Board of Ethical Review distinguished Engineer A's volunteer standards committee role from the governmental employment conflicts in BER 67-1 and BER 02-8, finding that volunteer public-benefit standards service does not create the same type of conflict as governmental employment or commercial dual-role arrangements.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (Standards Committee Chair, Forensic Expert Witness) and Ethics Reviewing Body
Obligation statement
Engineer A's volunteer service as chair of the boiler code standards and safety committee did not per se preclude him from serving as a forensic expert witness for Attorney X, provided he disclosed the committee relationship, exercised independent judgment, and had no other direct business or professional relationship with Engineer B beyond the committee supervisory relationship.
Temporal scope
At the time of accepting the forensic expert engagement
Source Evidence
Source text
In the present case, Engineer A is serving as a volunteer to a technical society standards-setting committee to develop fact-based objective technical codes and standards for the benefit of the public.

Text references
Engineer A's role as a private forensic engineering expert should not present any clear or apparent conflict of interest.
In the present case, Engineer A is serving as a volunteer to a technical society standards-setting committee to develop fact-based objective technical codes and standards for the benefit of the public.
The Board sees a clear difference from the earlier cases.
Unless there is some other direct business or professional relationship or history that Engineer A may have had that is not revealed under the facts, there does not appear to be any conflict.
TTL
@prefix case129: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case129:Engineer_A_Volunteer_Standards_Role_Non-Preclusion_of_Forensic_Service a proeth:VolunteerStandardsRoleNon-PreclusionofForensicExpertServiceObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Volunteer Standards Role Non-Preclusion of Forensic Service" ; proeth-core:competesWith case129:Engineer_A_Dual_Role_Appearance_of_Impropriety_Management_Committee_Chair_and_Defense_Expert ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case129:Engineer_A_Boiler_Case_Opposing_Expert_Shared_Committee_Leadership, case129:Engineer_A_Boiler_Code_Chair_Expert_Witness_Conflict_Assessment, case129:Engineer_A_Competing_Duties_-_Committee_Role_vs_Expert_Role, case129:Engineer_A_Conflict_of_Interest_-_Committee_Chair_vs_Opposing_Expert ; proeth:casecontext "The Board of Ethical Review distinguished Engineer A's volunteer standards committee role from the governmental employment conflicts in BER 67-1 and BER 02-8, finding that volunteer public-benefit standards service does not create the same type of conflict as governmental employment or commercial dual-role arrangements." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case129:Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Evolution_Principle_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Standards_Committee_Chair_Forensic_Expert, case129:Volunteer_Standards_Role_Independence_Preservation_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Standards_Committee_Chair_Forensic_Expert ; proeth:discoveredincase "129" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T19:43:57.085266+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "129" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T19:43:57.085266+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Standards Committee Chair, Forensic Expert Witness) and Ethics Reviewing Body" ; proeth:obligationclass "Volunteer Standards Role Non-Preclusion of Forensic Expert Service Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A's volunteer service as chair of the boiler code standards and safety committee did not per se preclude him from serving as a forensic expert witness for Attorney X, provided he disclosed the committee relationship, exercised independent judgment, and had no other direct business or professional relationship with Engineer B beyond the committee supervisory relationship." ; proeth:sourcetext "In the present case, Engineer A is serving as a volunteer to a technical society standards-setting committee to develop fact-based objective technical codes and standards for the benefit of the public." ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of accepting the forensic expert engagement" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's role as a private forensic engineering expert should not present any clear or apparent conflict of interest.", "In the present case, Engineer A is serving as a volunteer to a technical society standards-setting committee to develop fact-based objective technical codes and standards for the benefit of the public.", "The Board sees a clear difference from the earlier cases.", "Unless there is some other direct business or professional relationship or history that Engineer A may have had that is not revealed under the facts, there does not appear to be any conflict." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 129 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T19:54:29.983294"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 129 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
129
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T19:43:57.085266+00:00
First case
129
Generated
2026-02-27T19:43:57.085266+00:00
Attributed to
Case 129 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:54:29.983294
Generated by
ProEthica Case 129 Extraction