Engineer A Competing Duties - Committee Role vs Expert Role
Individual
8394025f
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#Engineer_A_Competing_Duties_-_Committee_Role_vs_Expert_Role
Properties
Parent
Activeperiod
From discovery of Engineer B's subcommittee membership through resolution of the conflict
Affectedparties
Attorney X
Boiler manufacturer
Committee members
Engineer A
Engineer B
Engineering society
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Stateclass
Competing Duties State
Subject
Engineer A's competing obligations as committee chair (impartiality, standards integrity) and as retained defense expert (client service, adversarial advocacy pressure)
Terminatedby
Disclosure and recusal, withdrawal from one role, or formal waiver by all parties
Triggeringevent
Engineer A learns that opposing expert Engineer B is a member of Engineer A's committee, creating tension between committee leadership duties and adversarial expert role
Urgencylevel
high
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A, who chairs a boiler code standards and safety committee within an engineering society
Text References
Engineer A learns that the forensic engineering expert for the plaintiff, Engineer B, is a member of one of the technical subcommittees within the boiler code standards and safety committee that Engineer A chairs
Engineer A, who chairs a boiler code standards and safety committee within an engineering society
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_129: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/129#Engineer_A_Competing_Duties_-_Committee_Role_vs_Expert_Role> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Competing Duties - Committee Role vs Expert Role" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetingDutiesState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
8394025f1af48c31...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
129
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-02-27T19:33:30.742017+00:00
First Case
129
Generated
2026-02-27T19:33:30.742017+00:00
Attributed To
Case 129 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T19:54:29.972594
Generated By
ProEthica Case 129 Extraction