Engineer A Situation 1 Licensure Jurisdiction Omission Business Card
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#Engineer_A_Situation_1_Licensure_Jurisdiction_Omission_Business_Card
Properties
Instance of
Multi-StatePEBusinessCardLicensureJurisdictionIdentificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Multi-StatePEBusinessCardLicensureJurisdictionIdentificationObligation
Case context
Situation 1: Engineer A attends a business meeting in State E and distributes a PE-designated card that omits the states of licensure entirely.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to identify on his business card the specific states (B, C, D) in which he holds licensure when distributing a PE-designated card at a business meeting in State E.
Temporal scope
At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Situation 1 - No Physical Address Business Card Ambiguity
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A participates in a business meeting in State E and hands out a business card indicating that he is a P.E.
Text references
Engineer A participates in a business meeting in State E and hands out a business card indicating that he is a P.E.
The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed.
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case128:Engineer_A_Situation_1_Licensure_Jurisdiction_Omission_Business_Card a proeth:Multi-StatePEBusinessCardLicensureJurisdictionIdentificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Situation 1 Licensure Jurisdiction Omission Business Card" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case128:Situation_1_-_No_Physical_Address_Business_Card_Ambiguity ;
proeth:casecontext "Situation 1: Engineer A attends a business meeting in State E and distributes a PE-designated card that omits the states of licensure entirely." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case128:PE_Title_Omission_of_Licensure_Jurisdiction_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_Situation_1,
case128:Qualification_Transparency_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Situation_1_Business_Card ;
proeth:discoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Multi-State PE Business Card Licensure Jurisdiction Identification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to identify on his business card the specific states (B, C, D) in which he holds licensure when distributing a PE-designated card at a business meeting in State E." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A participates in a business meeting in State E and hands out a business card indicating that he is a P.E." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of distributing the business card at the State E business meeting" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A participates in a business meeting in State E and hands out a business card indicating that he is a P.E.",
"The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.650700"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T21:57:17.572153+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.650700
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction