PE Title Omission of Licensure Jurisdiction Disclosure Obligation Invoked Situation 1
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#PE_Title_Omission_of_Licensure_Jurisdiction_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_Situation_1
Properties
Instance of
PETitleOmissionofLicensureJurisdictionDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PETitleOmissionofLicensureJurisdictionDisclosureObligation
Applied to
Business card used at business meeting in State E
Balancing with
Practical business card design constraints
Concrete expression
Engineer A presents a PE-designated business card at a business meeting in State E without identifying the states (B, C, D) in which licensure is held, potentially implying licensure in State E where none exists.
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Interpretation
The omission of state-of-licensure identification on a PE-designated card used in a business context in an unlicensed state creates a misleading impression that the engineer is licensed in the jurisdiction of presentation.
Invoked by
Engineer A Situation 1 Multi-Jurisdiction Business Card Presenter
Tension resolution
The obligation to disclose states of licensure outweighs practical convenience; Situation 2 demonstrates that compliance is achievable.
Source Evidence
Source text
does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed
Text references
The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed.
TTL
@prefix case128: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/128#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case128:PE_Title_Omission_of_Licensure_Jurisdiction_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_Situation_1 a proeth:PETitleOmissionofLicensureJurisdictionDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "PE Title Omission of Licensure Jurisdiction Disclosure Obligation Invoked Situation 1" ;
proeth:appliedto "Business card used at business meeting in State E" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Practical business card design constraints" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A presents a PE-designated business card at a business meeting in State E without identifying the states (B, C, D) in which licensure is held, potentially implying licensure in State E where none exists." ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T21:55:27.009831+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "128" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T21:55:27.009831+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The omission of state-of-licensure identification on a PE-designated card used in a business context in an unlicensed state creates a misleading impression that the engineer is licensed in the jurisdiction of presentation." ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Situation 1 Multi-Jurisdiction Business Card Presenter" ;
proeth:principleclass "PE Title Omission of Licensure Jurisdiction Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:sourcetext "does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The obligation to disclose states of licensure outweighs practical convenience; Situation 2 demonstrates that compliance is achievable." ;
proeth:textreferences "The business card lists Engineer A's name, phone, fax, and e-mail address but does not list a mailing address, nor does it identify the states in which Engineer A is licensed." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 128 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T22:14:48.638232"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 128 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
128
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T21:55:27.009831+00:00
First case
128
Generated
2026-02-28T21:55:27.009831+00:00
Attributed to
Case 128 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T22:14:48.638232
Generated by
ProEthica Case 128 Extraction