Engineer A Citizen-Retained Highway Route Alternative Engineer
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Engineer_A_Citizen-Retained_Highway_Route_Alternative_Engineer
Definition
Retained by adversely affected citizens to study the proposed route X and evaluate alternatives; concludes that route Y is superior
Properties
Instance of
Citizen-RetainedHighwayRouteAlternativeEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Citizen-RetainedHighwayRouteAlternativeEngineer
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer (implied) |
| firm | Same firm as Engineer B |
| position | Engineer (partner-level firm member) |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | client |
| target | Adversely Affected Highway Route Citizens Client |
| type | peer |
| target | Engineer B Professional Society Endorsement Soliciting Engineer |
| type | subject_of_advocacy |
| target | State Highway Department Route Proposing Authority |
Role category
provider_client
Relationships
adheresToPrinciple
Adversarial Engagement Objectivity Obligation Applied to Route Study, Civic Service as Professional Duty Invoked for Highway Route Advocacy, Client Loyalty Fulfilled Through Objective Route Y Advocacy, Honest Disagreement Permissibility Between Engineer A and State Highway Department, Multi-Interest Balancing in Highway Route Alternative Analysis, Public Policy Engineering Debate Open Resolution in Highway Route Controversy, Public Welfare Paramount Invoked in Highway Route Selection, Transparent Advocacy Through Legitimate Channels by Engineers A and B
hasObligation
Engineer A Citizen-Retained Route Study Adversarial Objectivity, Engineer A Honest Disagreement With State Highway Department Route X, Engineer A Public Controversy Honest Objectivity Route Study, Engineer A Public Policy Engineering Debate Post-Decision Acceptance Route Controversy, Engineer A Route Y Complete Comparative Analysis
Source Evidence
Source text
A group of local citizens who believe they will be adversely affected by the proposed routing employ Engineer A to study the proposed route
Text references
A group of local citizens who believe they will be adversely affected by the proposed routing employ Engineer A to study the proposed route
Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route
TTL
@prefix case125: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case125:Engineer_A_Citizen-Retained_Highway_Route_Alternative_Engineer a proeth:Citizen-RetainedHighwayRouteAlternativeEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Citizen-Retained Highway Route Alternative Engineer" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case125:Adversarial_Engagement_Objectivity_Obligation_Applied_to_Route_Study,
case125:Civic_Service_as_Professional_Duty_Invoked_for_Highway_Route_Advocacy,
case125:Client_Loyalty_Fulfilled_Through_Objective_Route_Y_Advocacy,
case125:Honest_Disagreement_Permissibility_Between_Engineer_A_and_State_Highway_Department,
case125:Multi-Interest_Balancing_in_Highway_Route_Alternative_Analysis,
case125:Public_Policy_Engineering_Debate_Open_Resolution_in_Highway_Route_Controversy,
case125:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_in_Highway_Route_Selection,
case125:Transparent_Advocacy_Through_Legitimate_Channels_by_Engineers_A_and_B ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case125:Engineer_A_Citizen-Retained_Route_Study_Adversarial_Objectivity,
case125:Engineer_A_Honest_Disagreement_With_State_Highway_Department_Route_X,
case125:Engineer_A_Public_Controversy_Honest_Objectivity_Route_Study,
case125:Engineer_A_Public_Policy_Engineering_Debate_Post-Decision_Acceptance_Route_Controversy,
case125:Engineer_A_Route_Y_Complete_Comparative_Analysis ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer (implied)', 'firm': 'Same firm as Engineer B', 'position': 'Engineer (partner-level firm member)'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Retained by adversely affected citizens to study the proposed route X and evaluate alternatives; concludes that route Y is superior" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T10:45:47.804539+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T10:45:47.804539+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'client', 'target': 'Adversely Affected Highway Route Citizens Client'}",
"{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer B Professional Society Endorsement Soliciting Engineer'}",
"{'type': 'subject_of_advocacy', 'target': 'State Highway Department Route Proposing Authority'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Citizen-Retained Highway Route Alternative Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "A group of local citizens who believe they will be adversely affected by the proposed routing employ Engineer A to study the proposed route" ;
proeth:textreferences "A group of local citizens who believe they will be adversely affected by the proposed routing employ Engineer A to study the proposed route",
"Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 125 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:07:26.778949"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 125 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
125
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T10:45:47.804539+00:00
First case
125
Generated
2026-03-02T10:45:47.804539+00:00
Attributed to
Case 125 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:07:26.778949
Generated by
ProEthica Case 125 Extraction