Engineer A Route Y Complete Comparative Analysis
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#Engineer_A_Route_Y_Complete_Comparative_Analysis
Properties
Instance of
RouteAlternativeCompleteComparativeAnalysisObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#RouteAlternativeCompleteComparativeAnalysisObligation
Case context
Engineer A studied the proposed route X and evaluated route Y as a superior alternative for adversely affected citizens
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to present a complete comparative analysis of routes X and Y — including the advantages and disadvantages of each — so that the citizens client and any professional bodies reviewing the findings could make a fully informed assessment of the route alternatives.
Temporal scope
Upon completion of the route study and preparation of findings
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route.
Text references
Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route.
TTL
@prefix case125: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/125#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case125:Engineer_A_Route_Y_Complete_Comparative_Analysis a proeth:RouteAlternativeCompleteComparativeAnalysisObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Route Y Complete Comparative Analysis" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case125:Engineer_A_Citizen-Retained_Route_Study_Adversarial_Objectivity ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A studied the proposed route X and evaluated route Y as a superior alternative for adversely affected citizens" ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case125:Adversarial_Engagement_Objectivity_Obligation_Applied_to_Route_Study,
case125:Multi-Interest_Balancing_in_Highway_Route_Alternative_Analysis ;
proeth:discoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T10:51:59.586492+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "125" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T10:51:59.586492+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Route Alternative Complete Comparative Analysis Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to present a complete comparative analysis of routes X and Y — including the advantages and disadvantages of each — so that the citizens client and any professional bodies reviewing the findings could make a fully informed assessment of the route alternatives." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon completion of the route study and preparation of findings" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A concludes that route Y would be a superior route." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 125 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:07:26.783923"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 125 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
125
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T10:51:59.586492+00:00
First case
125
Generated
2026-03-02T10:51:59.586492+00:00
Attributed to
Case 125 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:07:26.783923
Generated by
ProEthica Case 125 Extraction