Engineer CADD Document Sealing Review Adequacy
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/120#Engineer_CADD_Document_Sealing_Review_Adequacy
Definition
Engineer who signs and seals CADD-prepared documents not personally drafted by the engineer
Properties
Instance of
ResponsibleChargeReviewAdequacyState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ResponsibleChargeReviewAdequacyState
Active period
From the point at which CADD-prepared documents are submitted for sealing through completion of the engineer's detailed review
Affected parties
Clients
Engineer of record
Public
Regulatory authorities
Subordinates or CADD operators who prepared documents
Confidence
0.9
Principle Transformation
Transforms the sealing and responsible charge principle into a concrete obligation to perform detailed review, distinguishing between the impermissible practice of sealing without review and the permissible practice of sealing after sufficient direction, control, and review even without personal preparation.
Subject
Engineer who signs and seals CADD-prepared documents not personally drafted by the engineer
Terminated by
Engineer completes sufficiently detailed check and review and assumes full responsibility, or declines to seal
Triggering event
Engineer is presented with CADD-prepared documents for signature and seal
Urgency level
high
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatesConstraint
Engineer A Responsible Charge Seal CADD, Engineer B Responsible Charge Sealing
activatesObligation
Engineer A Detailed Review Sealing, Engineer B Full Responsibility Assumption Sealing, Engineer B Responsible Charge Supervisory Seal
affects
Agent Engineer A, Agent Engineer B
Source Evidence
Text references
The key requirement is that an engineer possesses sufficient competence, assumes full responsibility for the work product and carefully directs, controls and reviews the material prepared under the engineer's responsible charge
it would not be unethical for an engineer to sign and seal the drawings in question as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail
Source text
it would not be unethical for an engineer to sign and seal the drawings in question as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail
TTL
@prefix case120: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/120#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case120:Engineer_CADD_Document_Sealing_Review_Adequacy a proeth:ResponsibleChargeReviewAdequacyState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer CADD Document Sealing Review Adequacy" ;
proeth-core:activatesConstraint case120:Engineer_A_Responsible_Charge_Seal_CADD,
case120:Engineer_B_Responsible_Charge_Sealing ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case120:Engineer_A_Detailed_Review_Sealing,
case120:Engineer_B_Full_Responsibility_Assumption_Sealing,
case120:Engineer_B_Responsible_Charge_Supervisory_Seal ;
proeth-core:affects case120:Agent_Engineer_A,
case120:Agent_Engineer_B ;
proeth:activePeriod "From the point at which CADD-prepared documents are submitted for sealing through completion of the engineer's detailed review" ;
proeth:affectedParties "Clients",
"Engineer of record",
"Public",
"Regulatory authorities",
"Subordinates or CADD operators who prepared documents" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms the sealing and responsible charge principle into a concrete obligation to perform detailed review, distinguishing between the impermissible practice of sealing without review and the permissible practice of sealing after sufficient direction, control, and review even without personal preparation." ;
proeth:stateClass "Responsible Charge Review Adequacy State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer who signs and seals CADD-prepared documents not personally drafted by the engineer" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Engineer completes sufficiently detailed check and review and assumes full responsibility, or declines to seal" ;
proeth:textReferences "The key requirement is that an engineer possesses sufficient competence, assumes full responsibility for the work product and carefully directs, controls and reviews the material prepared under the engineer's responsible charge",
"it would not be unethical for an engineer to sign and seal the drawings in question as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail" ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "Engineer is presented with CADD-prepared documents for signature and seal" ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "high" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 120 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T18:05:44.602441+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 120 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "it would not be unethical for an engineer to sign and seal the drawings in question as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer who signs and seals CADD-prepared documents not personally drafted by the engineer" ;
skos:definition "Engineer who signs and seals CADD-prepared documents not personally drafted by the engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T18:05:44.602441+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 120 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 120 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
120
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-04T18:05:44.602441+00:00
First case
120
Generated
2026-06-04T18:05:44.602441+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 120 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 120 Extraction