Engineer A Detailed Review Sealing

@prefix case120: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/120#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case120:Engineer_A_Detailed_Review_Sealing a proeth:DetailedReviewSealingObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Detailed Review Sealing" ; proeth-core:obligatedParty case120:Agent_Engineer_A ; proeth:caseContext "Engineer A personally prepares engineering documents using a CADD system and then signs and seals those documents as the registered professional engineer of record." ; proeth:complianceStatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.86" ; proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationClass "Detailed Review Sealing Obligation" ; proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to check and review in some detail the engineering documents personally prepared using the CADD system before affixing the seal, ensuring the seal reflected genuine professional oversight of the content." ; proeth:temporalScope "Before affixing the professional seal to CADD-generated documents" ; proeth:textReferences "The key requirement is that an engineer possesses sufficient competence, assumes full responsibility for the work product and carefully directs, controls and reviews the material prepared under the engineer's responsible charge.", "We would conclude that it was not unethical for the engineer in that instance to seal plans that were not personally prepared by him as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail." ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 120 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T18:11:22.208486+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 120 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.87 ; proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Detailed Review Sealing Obligation': This obligation is a close match to the existing Responsible Charge Seal Obligation, which requires a licensed engineer to apply their seal only to work products they have personally reviewed with sufficient depth and competence. The present obligation adds the clarification that personal preparation is not required but detailed review is, which is a refinement of the same core duty rather than a distinct new concept." ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:ResponsibleChargeSealObligation ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Responsible Charge Seal Obligation" ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ; proeth-prov:sourceText "We would conclude that it was not unethical for the engineer in that instance to seal plans that were not personally prepared by him as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail." ; proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext", "complianceStatus", "confidence", "obligationClass", "obligationStatement", "temporalScope", "textReferences" ; rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to check and review in some detail the engineering documents personally prepared using the CADD system before affixing the seal, ensuring the seal reflected genuine professional oversight of the content." ; skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to check and review in some detail the engineering documents personally prepared using the CADD system before affixing the seal, ensuring the seal reflected genuine professional oversight of the content." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T18:11:22.208486+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 120 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 120 Extraction" .