Engineer B Detailed Review Sealing Subordinate Work

@prefix case120: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/120#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case120:Engineer_B_Detailed_Review_Sealing_Subordinate_Work a proeth:DetailedReviewSealingObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer B Detailed Review Sealing Subordinate Work" ; proeth-core:competesWith case120:Engineer_B_Responsible_Charge_Supervisory_Seal ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case120:Engineer_CADD_Document_Sealing_Review_Adequacy ; proeth-core:obligatedParty case120:Agent_Engineer_B ; proeth:caseContext "Engineer B signs and seals engineering documents produced by others working under Engineer B's direction and control using a CADD system. The prior BER Case 86-2 scenario involved a chief engineer who believed general supervision without detailed review was sufficient." ; proeth:complianceStatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case120:Engineer_B_Responsible_Charge_Subordinate_Work ; proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer B" ; proeth:obligationClass "Detailed Review Sealing Obligation" ; proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer B was obligated to check and review in some detail the engineering documents prepared by subordinates using the CADD system before affixing the seal, and could not ethically seal documents that had not been reviewed in some detail even if Engineer B had general confidence in the subordinates' abilities." ; proeth:temporalScope "Before affixing the professional seal to documents prepared by subordinates" ; proeth:textReferences "In deciding that it was unethical for him to seal plans that had not been prepared by him, or which he had not checked and reviewed in detail, the Board read the language in Section II.2.b. quite literally.", "The key requirement is that an engineer possesses sufficient competence, assumes full responsibility for the work product and carefully directs, controls and reviews the material prepared under the engineer's responsible charge.", "We would conclude that it was not unethical for the engineer in that instance to seal plans that were not personally prepared by him as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail." ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 120 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T18:11:22.208486+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 120 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.87 ; proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Detailed Review Sealing Obligation': This obligation is a close match to the existing Responsible Charge Seal Obligation, which requires a licensed engineer to apply their seal only to work products they have personally reviewed with sufficient depth and competence. The present obligation adds the clarification that personal preparation is not required but detailed review is, which is a refinement of the same core duty rather than a distinct new concept." ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:ResponsibleChargeSealObligation ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Responsible Charge Seal Obligation" ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ; proeth-prov:sourceText "We would conclude that it was not unethical for the engineer in that instance to seal plans that were not personally prepared by him as long as those plans were checked and reviewed by the engineer in some detail." ; proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext", "complianceStatus", "confidence", "obligationClass", "obligationStatement", "temporalScope", "textReferences" ; rdfs:comment "Engineer B was obligated to check and review in some detail the engineering documents prepared by subordinates using the CADD system before affixing the seal, and could not ethically seal documents that had not been reviewed in some detail even if Engineer B had general confidence in the subordinates' abilities." ; skos:definition "Engineer B was obligated to check and review in some detail the engineering documents prepared by subordinates using the CADD system before affixing the seal, and could not ethically seal documents that had not been reviewed in some detail even if Engineer B had general confidence in the subordinates' abilities." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T18:11:22.208486+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 120 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 120 Extraction" .