Engineer C Good Intent Non-Justification Procurement Promise City X

@prefix case117: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case117:Engineer_C_Good_Intent_Non-Justification_Procurement_Promise_City_X a proeth:GoodIntentNon-JustificationforProceduralImproprietyObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer C Good Intent Non-Justification Procurement Promise City X" ; proeth-core:competesWith case117:Engineer_C_Competitive_Procurement_Fairness_City_X_Future_Contract, case117:Engineer_C_Competitive_Procurement_Fairness_City_X_Future_Project, case117:Engineer_C_Honorable_Professional_Conduct_Procurement_City_X, case117:Engineer_C_Procurement_Law_Compliance_City_X_Verbal_Promise, case117:Engineer_C_Public_Announcement_Open_Competition_Minimum_Standard_City_X, case117:Engineer_C_Public_Procurement_Authority_Competitive_Process_Enforcement_City_X, case117:Engineer_C_Verbal_Pre-Selection_Promise_Non-Issuance_City_X_Future_Project ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#Competitive_Procurement_Public_Interest_Alignment_—_City_X>, case117:Engineer_C_Conflict_of_Interest_from_Promise, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#Engineer_C_Procurement_Subversion_—_City_X_Future_Contract>, case117:Engineer_C_Verbal_Pre-Award_Promise_to_Engineer_As_Firm, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#Free_and_Open_Competition_Framework_—_City_X_Procurement_Context>, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#Informal_Pre-Award_Selection_Commitment_—_Engineer_C_to_Engineer_A> ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer C's verbal promise was made 'in recognition' of Engineer A's work, suggesting a constructive and appreciative motivation rather than corrupt intent, but the promise nonetheless circumvented competitive procurement requirements." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case117:Procurement_Integrity_Over_Merit_Balancing_Applied_to_Pre-Selection_Arrangement, case117:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Underlying_Procurement_Integrity_Requirement ; proeth:discoveredincase "117" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T15:49:01.734296+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "117" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T15:49:01.734296+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer C" ; proeth:obligationclass "Good Intent Non-Justification for Procedural Impropriety Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer C was obligated to recognize that the benign and appreciative motivation behind the verbal pre-selection promise — recognition of Engineer A's genuine contribution to securing the grant — did not render the promise ethically permissible, and that good intent cannot justify bypassing formal competitive procurement processes." ; proeth:sourcetext "In recognition of Engineer A's work in securing the grant, Engineer C, the chief city engineer, verbally promises to select Engineer A's firm on a future engineering project for City X" ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time Engineer C made the verbal promise" ; proeth:textreferences "In recognition of Engineer A's work in securing the grant, Engineer C, the chief city engineer, verbally promises to select Engineer A's firm on a future engineering project for City X" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 117 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T16:01:19.959703"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 117 Extraction" .