Engineer C Conflict of Interest from Promise
Individual
f451090d
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#Engineer_C_Conflict_of_Interest_from_Promise
Properties
Parent
Activeperiod
From the moment of the verbal promise through any future procurement decision involving Engineer A's firm
Affectedparties
City X
Competing firms
Engineer A's firm
Engineer C
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Stateclass
Conflict of Interest State
Subject
Engineer C's personal commitment to Engineer A's firm conflicting with official duty to conduct impartial procurement
Terminatedby
Formal recusal from future procurement, or rescission of promise and proper process
Triggeringevent
Engineer C makes a personal verbal promise to select Engineer A's firm, creating a personal obligation that conflicts with official impartiality duties
Urgencylevel
high
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer C, the chief city engineer, verbally promises to select Engineer A's firm on a future engineering project for City X
Text References
Engineer C, the chief city engineer, verbally promises to select Engineer A's firm on a future engineering project for City X
In recognition of Engineer A's work in securing the grant
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_117: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/117#Engineer_C_Conflict_of_Interest_from_Promise> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer C Conflict of Interest from Promise" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictofInterestState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
f451090d89272866...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
117
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-02-28T15:44:23.750941+00:00
First Case
117
Generated
2026-02-28T15:44:23.750941+00:00
Attributed To
Case 117 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T16:01:19.946578
Generated By
ProEthica Case 117 Extraction