Engineer A Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation Activated
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#Engineer_A_Peer_Competence_Challenge_Reporting_Obligation_Activated
Properties
Instance of
PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState
Active period
From Engineer A's report of concerns to the contractor onward, pending resolution
Affected parties
Construction Contractor
Engineer A
Engineer B
Public safety stakeholders
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's obligation — having identified an objective basis to question Engineer B's competence on a shared project — to report concerns to the contractor and potentially escalate further
Terminated by
Contractor remediation (replacing or qualifying Engineer B), Engineer B's withdrawal, or Engineer A's withdrawal from the project
Triggering event
Engineer A reporting reservations about Engineer B's competence to the contractor, initiating the sequential escalation obligation
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A has reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings and reports his concerns to the contractor
Text references
Engineer A has reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings and reports his concerns to the contractor
TTL
@prefix case110: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case110:Engineer_A_Peer_Competence_Challenge_Reporting_Obligation_Activated a proeth:PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation Activated" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's report of concerns to the contractor onward, pending resolution" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Construction Contractor",
"Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Public safety stakeholders" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:09:22.826305+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:09:22.826305+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A has reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings and reports his concerns to the contractor" ;
proeth:stateclass "Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's obligation — having identified an objective basis to question Engineer B's competence on a shared project — to report concerns to the contractor and potentially escalate further" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Contractor remediation (replacing or qualifying Engineer B), Engineer B's withdrawal, or Engineer A's withdrawal from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has reservations concerning the competence of Engineer B to design the structural footings and reports his concerns to the contractor" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A reporting reservations about Engineer B's competence to the contractor, initiating the sequential escalation obligation" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 110 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:30:44.189366"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 110 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
110
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:09:22.826305+00:00
First case
110
Generated
2026-03-01T10:09:22.826305+00:00
Attributed to
Case 110 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:30:44.189366
Generated by
ProEthica Case 110 Extraction