Engineer A Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#Engineer_A_Peer_Competence_Challenge_Reporting_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState
Active period
From Engineer A's formation of an objective basis to question Engineer B's competence through completion of the sequential escalation process
Affected parties
Client
Engineer A
Engineer B
Public
Relevant authorities
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's professional obligation upon determining Engineer B lacks structural competence
Terminated by
Engineer B's withdrawal from the project, or client and authorities addressing Engineer A's concerns, or Engineer A's own withdrawal from the project
Triggering event
Engineer A's objective assessment that Engineer B lacks the education, training, and experience to perform the required structural footing design
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
We believe that Engineer A has an objective basis to determine whether Engineer B has sufficient education, experience and training to perform the required structural design services.
Text references
If Engineer A determines that Engineer B does not possess the required education, training and experience to perform the services, we believe Engineer A has an ethical obligation to confront Engineer B to make his concerns known to Engineer B, recommending that Engineer B withdraw from the project.
If Engineer B refuses to acquiesce to Engineer A's recommendation, Engineer A has an obligation under the Code to bring the matter to the attention of his client and to the authorities as appropriate, and if necessary, withdraw from the project if his concerns are not met.
We believe that Engineer A has an objective basis to determine whether Engineer B has sufficient education, experience and training to perform the required structural design services.
TTL
@prefix case110: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/110#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case110:Engineer_A_Peer_Competence_Challenge_Reporting_Obligation a proeth:PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's formation of an objective basis to question Engineer B's competence through completion of the sequential escalation process" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client",
"Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Public",
"Relevant authorities" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T10:11:07.850411+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "110" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T10:11:07.850411+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "We believe that Engineer A has an objective basis to determine whether Engineer B has sufficient education, experience and training to perform the required structural design services." ;
proeth:stateclass "Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's professional obligation upon determining Engineer B lacks structural competence" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer B's withdrawal from the project, or client and authorities addressing Engineer A's concerns, or Engineer A's own withdrawal from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "If Engineer A determines that Engineer B does not possess the required education, training and experience to perform the services, we believe Engineer A has an ethical obligation to confront Engineer B to make his concerns known to Engineer B, recommending that Engineer B withdraw from the project.",
"If Engineer B refuses to acquiesce to Engineer A's recommendation, Engineer A has an obligation under the Code to bring the matter to the attention of his client and to the authorities as appropriate, and if necessary, withdraw from the project if his concerns are not met.",
"We believe that Engineer A has an objective basis to determine whether Engineer B has sufficient education, experience and training to perform the required structural design services." ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's objective assessment that Engineer B lacks the education, training, and experience to perform the required structural footing design" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 110 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T10:30:44.194702"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 110 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
110
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T10:11:07.850411+00:00
First case
110
Generated
2026-03-01T10:11:07.850411+00:00
Attributed to
Case 110 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T10:30:44.194702
Generated by
ProEthica Case 110 Extraction